On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 09:02 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 2017-02-15 8:37 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 09:36 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> >> On 2017-02-08 05:07 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> >>> This should be applicable to all branches which have the tpm.cfg file
> >>> that
On 2017-02-15 9:54 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 09:02 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2017-02-15 8:37 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 09:36 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2017-02-08 05:07 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
This should be applicable to all branches which h
On 2017-02-15 8:37 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 09:36 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 2017-02-08 05:07 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
This should be applicable to all branches which have the tpm.cfg file
that I submitted recently. Sorry for missing the warning earlier - I
must have me
On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 09:36 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 2017-02-08 05:07 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > This should be applicable to all branches which have the tpm.cfg file
> > that I submitted recently. Sorry for missing the warning earlier - I
> > must have mentally blocked it out instead of
On 2017-02-08 05:07 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
This should be applicable to all branches which have the tpm.cfg file
that I submitted recently. Sorry for missing the warning earlier - I
must have mentally blocked it out instead of actually reading it :-/
No worries :D
I've merged these changes.
This should be applicable to all branches which have the tpm.cfg file
that I submitted recently. Sorry for missing the warning earlier - I
must have mentally blocked it out instead of actually reading it :-/
The dm-verity change is relevant for some experimental work that I am
doing at the moment.
