On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:36:53PM +0200, Alexander Aring wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 02:07:21PM -0700, Andrey Yurovsky wrote:
> > I'm troubleshooting issues with an Atmel AT86RF212 radio on mainline
> > (3.17-rc5 at this time) and was wondering about forcing an active scan
> > via the "iz sca
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 02:07:21PM -0700, Andrey Yurovsky wrote:
> I'm troubleshooting issues with an Atmel AT86RF212 radio on mainline
> (3.17-rc5 at this time) and was wondering about forcing an active scan
> via the "iz scan" command. This comes back as not supported so I
> wanted to understand
I'm troubleshooting issues with an Atmel AT86RF212 radio on mainline
(3.17-rc5 at this time) and was wondering about forcing an active scan
via the "iz scan" command. This comes back as not supported so I
wanted to understand why.
It looks like ieee802154_scan_req() should be invoked in nl-mac.c
For 802.15.4 USB hardware, there are two devices that I'm familiar with
both based on the Atmel AT86RF231 transceiver: The RZUSB stick from
Atmel and the family of USB transceivers from Dresden Electronik. Both
devices will present themselves to the USB host as a ACM serial port,
and they'll ha
Hello,
I am looking for a 802.15.4 USB dongle. The host device would be Linux
(OpenWrt). I plan run 6LowPan on top of it. Any suggestions? I've checked
the 3.16 kernel source - the drivers i've seen there are all for devices
attached over SPI. Is there a viable USB option today?
Thanks!
Regard
> Thanks again for the detailed response. To give some context our
> powerline PHY isn't like any in the 802.15.4 spec and we are hoping to
> utilise just the MAC. I need to check with the system guys but I think
> we can only multiplex multiple WPANs in time not frequency. We would
> also need t
On 27/03/14 20:10, Phoebe Buckheister wrote:
>> Hi Phoebe,
>>
>> Thank you for the swift response it has given my a lot to think about.
>> I remember the discussion and like you I was in favour of removing the
>> slave list. But as chance would have it I think we may actually need it
>> now or som
> Hi Phoebe,
>
> Thank you for the swift response it has given my a lot to think about.
> I remember the discussion and like you I was in favour of removing the
> slave list. But as chance would have it I think we may actually need it
> now or some other method of multiple WPANs per PHY.
In that
On 27/03/14 19:13, Phoebe Buckheister wrote:
>> Is it possible for a device to co-ordinate more than 1 WPAN on the same
>> PHY, beacon enabled or beaconless?
>> If so is it possible to bridge or route from one WPAN to another within
>> a device over the same PHY?
>> Can a slave join more than one W
> Is it possible for a device to co-ordinate more than 1 WPAN on the same
> PHY, beacon enabled or beaconless?
> If so is it possible to bridge or route from one WPAN to another within
> a device over the same PHY?
> Can a slave join more than one WPAN, again using the same PHY?
Theoretically yes
Hi,
A couple of questions on 802.15.4:
Is it possible for a device to co-ordinate more than 1 WPAN on the same
PHY, beacon enabled or beaconless?
If so is it possible to bridge or route from one WPAN to another within
a device over the same PHY?
Can a slave join more than one WPAN, again using t
On 06/03/14 23:06, Phoebe Buckheister wrote:
> On Thu, March 6, 2014 10:24 pm, Martin Townsend wrote:
>> I was going to start implementing some low level features of the
>> 802.15.4 MAC layer in SW such as Inter Frame Gap, Clear Channel
>> Assessment (including the backoff algorithm), and Acknowled
On Thu, March 6, 2014 10:24 pm, Martin Townsend wrote:
> I was going to start implementing some low level features of the
> 802.15.4 MAC layer in SW such as Inter Frame Gap, Clear Channel
> Assessment (including the backoff algorithm), and Acknowledgements and
> use this to hopefully lay down a bas
Hi,
I was going to start implementing some low level features of the
802.15.4 MAC layer in SW such as Inter Frame Gap, Clear Channel
Assessment (including the backoff algorithm), and Acknowledgements and
use this to hopefully lay down a basic scheduler for higher level
features for a beacon en
On 08/02/2012 12:35 PM, Alexander Smirnov wrote:
> currently I'm in a bussiness trip and there is no time for 802.15.4
> topic, will be fully available starting from Monday.
> So please do not think that I'm ignoring you :-)
Hi Alex,
No problem. I can now successfully ping6 between my two systems
> On 07/31/2012 12:04 PM, Alan Ott wrote:
>> I'm trying to follow the directions at linux-wsn[1] and am not having
>> much luck. Since I don't have the at91sam9g20ek board, I'm trying this
>> on my desktop PC with an Econotag[2] (using the serial.c driver I pulled
>> from [3]) and on a BeagleBone w
On 07/31/2012 12:04 PM, Alan Ott wrote:
> I'm trying to follow the directions at linux-wsn[1] and am not having
> much luck. Since I don't have the at91sam9g20ek board, I'm trying this
> on my desktop PC with an Econotag[2] (using the serial.c driver I pulled
> from [3]) and on a BeagleBone with an
Hello,
I'm trying to follow the directions at linux-wsn[1] and am not having
much luck. Since I don't have the at91sam9g20ek board, I'm trying this
on my desktop PC with an Econotag[2] (using the serial.c driver I pulled
from [3]) and on a BeagleBone with an MRF24J40 (using a driver I made [4]).
Hi
I am planning to use this stack for some development in 802.15.4 based
product. Can anybody please advice me whether the stack clears the
compliance. If there is any report or any data can any body can share the
same.
If there is a deviation in compliance i am planning to fix the same for the
Oh,
Thank you, Stefan!
14.11.2011, в 22:07, Stefan Schmidt написал(а):
> Hello.
>
> On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 21:17, Alexander Smirnov wrote:
>>
>> IIRC Werner (I added him to Cc) has reworked version of at91 driver for USB
>> support.
>
> Its a usb device with an atmel micro controller and the
Hello.
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 21:17, Alexander Smirnov wrote:
>
> IIRC Werner (I added him to Cc) has reworked version of at91 driver for USB
> support.
Its a usb device with an atmel micro controller and the AT86RF231
transceiver.
http://downloads.qi-hardware.com/people/werner/wpan/web/
Firmwa
Thanks a lot Alexander and Jon
2011/11/8 Alexander Smirnov
> Hello,
>
> IIRC Werner (I added him to Cc) has reworked version of at91 driver for
> USB support.
>
> To Werner: sorry if I'm wrong.
>
> With best regards,
> Alex
>
> 08.11.2011, в 19:48, Prajosh Premdas
> написал(а):
>
> > Hi
> >
> >
Hello,
IIRC Werner (I added him to Cc) has reworked version of at91 driver for USB
support.
To Werner: sorry if I'm wrong.
With best regards,
Alex
08.11.2011, в 19:48, Prajosh Premdas написал(а):
> Hi
>
> I have been working on 802.15.4 stack and have them working on various USB
> sticks.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Prajosh Premdas
wrote:
> Hi
> I have been working on 802.15.4 stack and have them working on various USB
> sticks. But i find that there is no support for any of the USB sticks on
> Linux. I even searched in the mail for the same and couldn't find any.
> Can anybod
Hi
I have been working on 802.15.4 stack and have them working on various USB
sticks. But i find that there is no support for any of the USB sticks on
Linux. I even searched in the mail for the same and couldn't find any.
Can anybody please point me to any of the artifacts regarding the same
--
I had a look to the firmware.
In order to cope with strict timings of 802.15.4, in its implementation,
Freescale sets the modem in streaming mode, otherwise there will be not enough
time for sending an ack (macAckWaitDuration is 54 symbol periods = 864us).
In streaming mode, while rx is in pro
26 matches
Mail list logo