I tested my payload(FILO.elf) with linux loader Grub.
It has no problem at all. So something must go wrong when linuxbios jumps to
the payload. FILO doesn't seem to run at all. No debug message over the
console.
Don’t’ know if there is anyone familiar with
ELF.
This is the message over
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Gin wrote:
> The question should be, does the irq_routing table matter at all?
> Linuxbios runs through till it jumps to the entry of payload. I am just
> trying to figure out why.
that's not irq table related, let's get our payload fixed first.
ron
If I have a wrong checksum
for my irq routing table, would that stops me from booting
successfully?
The question should be, does
the irq_routing table matter at all? Linuxbios runs
through till it jumps to the entry of payload. I am just trying to figure out
why.
Gin
This is the message I got in
the end. Linuxbios tries to load the ELF image.
It seems that there are 2
segments in the ELF. In the end, linuxbios jumps to an entry that looks like
the in the middle of the first segment.
Does it look right?
The FILO.elf
doesn’t seem to load succeffully.
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Last I looked a lot of the problem is design issues with the python
> parser generator the code is using. It does not do a very good job at
> remember making it possible to print good error messages.
yeah, that parser generator is disappointing in
YhLu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I add some code to debug_device to dump smbus for S4882.
>
> Please let me know if you need me to commit it.
I don't know about need but I think it could be handy to have.
Especially as we don't have many users of i2c code in the tree at the present
time.
Eri
Stefan Reinauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi there,
>
> the error disclosure of the config tool is a little bit mystic.
> Building the sandpoint configuration says the following:
> This looks like an error in the config tool, while it is a mistake in the
> config file. Is there any easy wa
Hi there,
the error disclosure of the config tool is a little bit mystic.
Building the sandpoint configuration says the following:
Creating directory motorola_sandpoint/only
Creating motorola_sandpoint/only/static.c
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "motorola_sandpoint/config.py", line 27
YhLu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is the difference between
> printk_debug("smbus: %s[%d]->", dev_path(dev->bus->dev),
> dev->bus->link );
> printk_debug("%s", dev_path(dev));
>
> and
>
> printk_debug("smbus: %s[%d]->%s", dev_path(dev->bus->dev),
> dev->bus->
Hi All,
I've just committed changes to the following files used by the VIA Epia
northbridge/via/vt8601/raminit.c
southbridge/via/vt8231/vt8231_early_smbus.c
Changes are as follows :-
re-written smbus_read_byte based on intel/i82801dbm after suggestion from ron,
modifications to raminit
I hope when power is on, my MB can boot without
press the switch. How can I do that?
tks
zhu
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo
___
11 matches
Mail list logo