Ward Vandewege wrote:
So, you've verified that the image that flashrom reads matches what you can
download from the manufacturers website (extracted)?
There will often be small differences between those, too. ie. in the
DMI area.
Flashrom doesn't crash or anything here, and it might just
Corey Osgood wrote:
So, I commented all the do_ram_commands out (since I can't see
the problem with it) and did ram init using pci_write_config16, setting
what I know the values should be, and then NOP would not report as being
set (and ram still failed). So, I set up a for loop to set NOP
Hi,
On 28.02.2007 21:53, Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote:
Other problem is the space, the 2MB BIOS flash is completely full, I
removed almost everything from kernel, including printk support. I
will apply the LZMA patch in kernel, maybe I will get more space.
LinuxBIOS has builtin LZMA support
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 12:15:33AM -0500, Ward Vandewege wrote:
That's odd. flashrom works fine on my DFI LANParty board, with the
patch I submitted that adds PCI ID 0x360. Maybe shadowing is enabled
only on certain vendors' BIOSes.
So, you've verified that the image that flashrom reads
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 09:48:12PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I would like to make a suggestion. I am a newbie to the LinuxBios
world. I love what I have seen so far. I am ok at C, know a little
assembly, and would love to contribute to the LinuxBios community. But
I am not
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 10:02:55PM -0800, yhlu wrote:
what is your Mem conf? 4G or 2G?
2 gigabytes of RAM in this machine.
Kernel version?
It's the default Gnewsense kernel, which is a slightly modified Ubuntu Dapper
2.6.15 kernel.
Thanks,
Ward.
--
Ward Vandewege [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 11:40:28AM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
Ward Vandewege wrote:
So, you've verified that the image that flashrom reads matches what you can
download from the manufacturers website (extracted)?
There will often be small differences between those, too. ie. in the
DMI
Lu, Yinghai wrote:
In the V2 you need to everyone happy
1. ROMCC: print
2. CAR: a. print
b. printk
c. print when ram is enabled already
d. printk when ram is enabled already
c/d are introduced for USBDebug direct, because dbg_info will be in RAM
instead of cache..
The best way to help might be to help write up documentation. Most people who
do far out programming don't like to do documentation. Lack of documentation
slows down second wavers like you and me. If you really want to know linuxbios
I would suggest you help write some good documentation. You
Ühel kenal päeval (neljapäev 01 märts 2007 8:27 am) kirjutas Hao Li:
Hi all,
I am porting olpc/rev_c which is gx2/cs5536 to gx2/cs5535. I have already
had VSA image loaded. But I still get the output below:
Finding PCI configuration type.
PCI: Sanity check failed
pci_check_direct
Hi all,
My platform is gx2 plus cs5535. I have loaded VSA image. It can boot to
payload if I don't add VGA support. Now I want to add VGA, do I need to
make a VGA image from Linux myself? cause I notice that if I use VSA,
graphics_init() just contains a vrWrite routine which just call VSA
code,
Hi all,
I know if i want to use linux kernel as payload to LinuxBIOS, I must
edit the source of Linux source code. I want some more detailed
information, such as:
1) what version of Linux? 2.4 or 2.6
2) how to make it tiny? less that 512KB? less than 256KB?
3) what to edit? Is there useable
In the copy_and_run you may need some debug print out. And copy_and_run
is after stack switching.
YH
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Reinauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 7:33 AM
To: Lu, Yinghai
Cc: Stefan Reinauer; Carl-Daniel Hailfinger;
But you share codes between ROMCC version and CAR version.
YH
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Reinauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 7:31 AM
To: Lu, Yinghai
Cc: Stefan Reinauer; Carl-Daniel Hailfinger; linuxbios@linuxbios.org
Subject: Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH]
--- James Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Brandon W. Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The GIGABYTE M57SLI-S4 [1] is the first-ever desktop motherboard
supported by a Free Open Source BIOS, thanks to AMD engineer
Yinghai
Lu who released GPL-licensed code last month. This
Hi There,
What other effects does the CONFIG_PCI_ROM_RUN have, I know that it
runs a PCI device's expansion rom during pci_dev_init but does it have
any other effects.
I have enabled it an attempt to get started on supporting VGA on
VMWare. I have left serial console on and kept vga and btext
yeah,
i'd imagine there are a lot of people watching/waiting for this board
to be supported. I would like to run linux-bios on my next machine,
but i'd rather not pay extra for server/board features that i will
never use.
so
my wishlist for a linuxbios:
1:consumer desktop board, running
On 28.02.2007 22:35, ron minnich wrote:
And this has passed abuild testing?
Yes. Please apply.
Regards,
Carl-Daniel
--
http://www.hailfinger.org/
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 06:09:07PM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
Copyright headers will be added later. Right now we benefit from
keeping the diff as small as possible.
Please include the correct license headers, we want to reduce the number
of files which don't have an explicit
On 01.03.2007 21:09, Uwe Hermann wrote:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 06:09:07PM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
Copyright headers will be added later. Right now we benefit from
keeping the diff as small as possible.
Please include the correct license headers, we want to reduce the number
of
Hi Carl,
2007/3/1, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
LinuxBIOS has builtin LZMA support which saves you ~30-50kb over
the LZMA kernel patch. Simply lzma the right vmlinux file.
sure, really this is a better idea, I will test it.
Regards,
Carl-Daniel
Best regards,
Alan
--
Dear all,
I am wondering if it would be possible to run LinuxBios on a braille
device. Regarded from a Linux point of view, such a device is very
similar to a PC or a laptop, as you will certainly notice according to
the datas provided below.
If the device is supported, the idea would be to
It is a great idea. Is that machine you are showing us kind of old? It
seems old, I am not sure about the northbridge.
ron
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
A trivial patch that has served me well for this particular flash chip. It
functions identically to some already supported Winbond chips so basically
all that was needed was an additional device ID for recognition. I've tested
read, erase, and write functionality.
As an interesting side note,
Hi,
all of the following mainboards fail to link for me on my openSUSE 10.2
x86_64 system with the following message:
gcc -m32 -nostdlib -nostartfiles -static -o linuxbios_ram -T
/storage/LinuxBIOSv2/src/config/linuxbios_ram.ld linuxbios_ram.o
linuxbios_ram.o: In function `div_long':
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 02:01:19PM -0800, David Hendricks wrote:
A trivial patch that has served me well for this particular flash chip. It
functions identically to some already supported Winbond chips so basically
all that was needed was an additional device ID for recognition. I've
Hi,
ron minnich, le Thu 01 Mar 2007 14:41:21 -0700, a écrit :
It is a great idea. Is that machine you are showing us kind of old? It
seems old, I am not sure about the northbridge.
It's a quite recent device, but it has oldy chips inside indeed...
Samuel
--
linuxbios mailing list
Oops! Thanks for the advice, I've been out of the loop for the past few
years but hope to get back into the swing of things here with school out of
the way grin.
I've re-attached my patch and have posted it here for those with strict mail
filters since it's small.
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks
I know Erik Andersen's buildrom maybe help, but when i type make all I
cannot compile the code successfully.
what error have you met ? if you can get olpc-payload.elf and
olpc-payload.elf.lzma in the deploy directory i think that is enough.
--
linuxbios mailing list
On 28.02.2007 19:12, Lu, Yinghai wrote:
Where will be ram_enabled? Cache or Ram?
If we want to call it from CAR, we must place it in cache.
Is cache content lost after switching off CAR?
Regards,
Carl-Daniel
--
http://www.hailfinger.org/
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
Ok, My SuperIO chip is a SMSC LPC47M192. Looks like I will be able to
use one of the other SMSC LPC47*** configs for a template. Once I get
it setup how do I test it without everything else (nothbridge,
southbridge, etc)??
Thanks - Joe
Quoting Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Feb
The Global variables area is copied from the cache to RAM, but position
is changed.
YH
-Original Message-
From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 4:17 PM
To: Lu, Yinghai
Cc: Stefan Reinauer; linuxbios@linuxbios.org
Subject: Re: [LinuxBIOS]
Author: uwe
Date: 2007-03-02 03:25:36 +0100 (Fri, 02 Mar 2007)
New Revision: 2565
Modified:
trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/util/flashrom/README
trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/util/flashrom/flash.h
trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/util/flashrom/flashchips.c
Log:
Add Winbond W39V080A support to Flashrom.
Signed-off-by: David
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 03:43:35PM -0800, David Hendricks wrote:
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Committed in r2565, thanks.
I fixed a small copy+paste error in a comment and added the new
chip to the list of supported chips in the README.
Cheers, Uwe.
--
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 07:23:15PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, My SuperIO chip is a SMSC LPC47M192. Looks like I will be able to
use one of the other SMSC LPC47*** configs for a template.
Yep. Please use the lpc47b272 as a basis, that one already has proper
license headers.
Once I
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:42:47PM +0100, Erwan Velu wrote:
Uwe Hermann wrote:
You need to write code for RAM initialization (northbridge) at the very
minimum. This is usually the hardest and most complex part.
Ok,
Do you have the respective ATI datasheets for the chipset? Are they
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 02:30:17PM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
Index: src/superio/ite/it8716f/it8716f_early_init.c
===
--- src/superio/ite/it8716f/it8716f_early_init.c(Revision 0)
+++
Hi All,
I've been seen many requests in the archives for a LinuxBios on N2200 (aka
8363) and apparently when I contacted them, none of them were able to
successsfully installed the linuxbios.
Before attempting to do the same, I would like to confirm with the experts like
Ron for the
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 07:13:20PM +0100, Ian Walker wrote:
Northbridge: Via KT266A(VT8366A)
Southbridge: Via VT8233
They're not supported yet, sorry. I haven't checked whether there are
public datasheets. Do you want to work on support for this chipset?
Probing for `ITE 8705F Super IO
Dear LinuxBIOS readers!
This is the automated build check service of LinuxBIOS.
The developer uwe checked in revision 2565 to
the LinuxBIOS source repository and caused the following
changes:
Change Log:
Add Winbond W39V080A support to Flashrom.
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks [EMAIL
#47: Screenshots and videos on the website
-+--
Reporter: uwe | Owner: somebody
Type: enhancement |Status: new
Priority: major
#70: fix util/getpir so that the output will compile
--+-
Reporter: Jon Dufresne [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Owner: somebody
Type: defect |Status: new
#36: Make the mailing list archive searchable
--+-
Reporter: rsmith | Owner: somebody
Type: defect |Status: closed
Priority: major |
#35: Make it possible to boot Windows using LinuxBIOS
+---
Reporter: uwe | Owner: somebody
Type: enhancement |Status: new
Priority: critical |
#14: Rename stream to payload
+---
Reporter: uwe | Owner: somebody
Type: enhancement |Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone:
#45: Enforce consistent coding style
+---
Reporter: uwe | Owner: somebody
Type: enhancement |Status: new
Priority: blocker | Milestone: Cosmetic
They're not supported yet, sorry. I haven't checked whether there are
public datasheets. Do you want to work on support for this chipset?
I'm not sure what I could do to help on this. I've no idea when it comes to
this sort of stuff. I could give it a go, if I knew what it was I needed
to
47 matches
Mail list logo
