Hello,
I'm looking for an eeprom/flash reader/writer device, but those I could find
at local vendors seem to be targetted only at win32, or even MS-DOG.
Does someone know a model that works with free software that you can recommend?
--
Robert Millan
My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 09:31:10AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Does someone know a model that works with free software that you
can recommend?
The GALEP V runs Linux internally, communicates over usbnet and the
Windows software runs fine in WINE.
A bit pricy but seems like a very nice product.
* Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070620 09:31]:
I'm looking for an eeprom/flash reader/writer device, but those I could find
at local vendors seem to be targetted only at win32, or even MS-DOG.
Does someone know a model that works with free software that you can
recommend?
The Galep IV
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 10:06:00AM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
* Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070620 09:31]:
I'm looking for an eeprom/flash reader/writer device, but those I could find
at local vendors seem to be targetted only at win32, or even MS-DOG.
Does someone know a model
* Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070620 10:39]:
- Does Galep IV support reading as well as writing? I suppose they support
reading at least for verification, but I want extraction of my propietary
bios(es) for reverse engineering if necessary.
Yes. Reading the flashes works fine.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 10:51:07AM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
- How good is support for different chips? Is a Galep IV enough to be
able to read/write almost every standard PC board around?
Yes, and a lot more. It reads/writes GALs, some microcontrollers, etc
Conitec has pretty
* Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070620 14:50]:
Yes, and a lot more. It reads/writes GALs, some microcontrollers, etc
Conitec has pretty good service. When you find a device that is not
supported, they will support it in one of the next releases
You mean this is handled in software?
On 20/06/07 10:08 -0300, Otávio Alcântara wrote:
Hello to all,
I'm porting a linuxbios v2 version for a board ref des LXUVCRDK (
http://www.amd.com/geodelxuvcrdk) based on norwich board. I've already got
to boot linux from HD, but it seems to halt in some point (see log below
Otávio Alcântara wrote:
Hello to all,
I'm porting a linuxbios v2 version for a board ref des
LXUVCRDK (http://www.amd.com/geodelxuvcrdk) based on norwich board. I've
already got to boot linux from HD, but it seems to halt in some point
(see log below captured from serial).
On 6/20/07, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yinghai,
can you look at the mail below?
ST/Ward,
can you apply the attached patch and then post a LB boot log on
a GA-M57SLI with BIOS_DEBUG or BIOS_SPEW and additionally dmasg and
lspci -vvvnx from the same boot? This would help
Thanks for the help. But I have another doubt, I'm not getting video working
even after the linux kernel boots. What do I do to change the console to
video? I've configured Filo to use video console, but the stream goes only
to serial interface.
Regards,
Otávio Alcântara
On 6/20/07, Marc Jones
Author: uwe
Date: 2007-06-20 19:21:49 +0200 (Wed, 20 Jun 2007)
New Revision: 364
Modified:
LinuxBIOSv3/lib/console.c
LinuxBIOSv3/util/xcompile/xcompile
Log:
Minor bugfixes:
- lib/console.c: BIOS_SPEW never kicked in.
- util/xcompile/xcompile: the function prefix isn't supported by all
Hello!
I just tried out the flashrom utility on my Sony Vaio VGN-FE11M laptop. I
think some of my hardware is not supported, see the output below:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] flashrom]$ sudo ./flashrom
Calibrating delay loop... ok
No LinuxBIOS table found.
Found chipset ICH7M: Enabling flash
Otávio Alcântara wrote:
Thanks for the help. But I have another doubt, I'm not getting video
working even after the linux kernel boots. What do I do to change the
console to video? I've configured Filo to use video console, but the
stream goes only to serial interface.
Regards,
Author: jcrouse
Date: 2007-06-20 23:26:45 +0200 (Wed, 20 Jun 2007)
New Revision: 7
Modified:
buildrom-devel/buildrom/bin/fetchsvn.sh
Log:
Do a sanity check in fetchsvn and bail out if SVN is not installed.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer stepan at
Author: jcrouse
Date: 2007-06-20 23:27:16 +0200 (Wed, 20 Jun 2007)
New Revision: 8
Modified:
buildrom-devel/buildrom/config/platforms/norwich.conf
Log:
Bump the Norwich revision to the current HEAD (grabbing any DB800 changes)
Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Stefan
Author: jcrouse
Date: 2007-06-20 23:27:47 +0200 (Wed, 20 Jun 2007)
New Revision: 9
Modified:
buildrom-devel/buildrom/Config.in
buildrom-devel/buildrom/config/platforms/platforms.conf
Log:
Allow the user to specify an arbitrary LinuxBIOS revision, overriding
the value in the configuration
Author: jcrouse
Date: 2007-06-20 23:28:10 +0200 (Wed, 20 Jun 2007)
New Revision: 10
Modified:
buildrom-devel/buildrom/packages/filo/filo.mk
Log:
Fix a bug in the FILO download target
Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer stepan at coresystems.de
Modified:
Author: jcrouse
Date: 2007-06-20 23:29:35 +0200 (Wed, 20 Jun 2007)
New Revision: 11
Added:
buildrom-devel/buildrom/config/platforms/db800.conf
buildrom-devel/buildrom/packages/filo/conf/db800-Config
Modified:
buildrom-devel/buildrom/config/platforms/Config.in
Author: jcrouse
Date: 2007-06-20 23:30:06 +0200 (Wed, 20 Jun 2007)
New Revision: 12
Modified:
buildrom-devel/buildrom/packages/etherboot/etherboot.mk
buildrom-devel/buildrom/packages/filo/filo.mk
buildrom-devel/buildrom/scripts/Makefile.generic
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 11:43:14AM +0700, Darmawan Salihun wrote:
And other thing is to remove the direct IO routine because it's too
dangerous and replace it with Windows driver setup API instead
because what flashrom need is only the PCI id's and some other
stuff that I think can be found in
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 07:45:15PM +0700, Darmawan Salihun wrote:
flashrom also maps the low 1MB for certain purposes.
Do you know why?
Therefore, I decided to modify the driver to support both address
range. I think it should be acceptable, isn't it?
Sure, if there's really a need for it.
Author: mjones
Date: 2007-06-21 01:45:44 +0200 (Thu, 21 Jun 2007)
New Revision: 2728
Added:
trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/src/mainboard/artecgroup/dbe61/cache_as_ram_auto.c
trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/src/mainboard/artecgroup/dbe61/spd_table.h
Removed:
trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/src/mainboard/artecgroup/dbe61/auto.c
committed in 2728
Marc
Marc Jones wrote:
This patch for the dbe61 gets to loading the payload but then crashes. I
think that the SPD table may need more refinement. (Note that it is
working on a Norwich platform so there is a subtle difference I have not
found yet.)
I felt like there
Added options in buildrom for the dbe61.
Marc
--
Marc Jones
Senior Software Engineer
(970) 226-9684 Office
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.amd.com/embeddedprocessors
Add Artec Group dbe61 mainboard.
Uses norwich defaults for the payloads.
Signed-off-by: Marc Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index:
* Peter Stuge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070621 01:00]:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 07:45:15PM +0700, Darmawan Salihun wrote:
flashrom also maps the low 1MB for certain purposes.
Do you know why?
For reading the LinuxBIOS table.
I unified memory mapping in LinuxBIOS a bit a while ago. There are a
lot
Dear LinuxBIOS readers!
This is the automated build check service of LinuxBIOS.
The developer mjones checked in revision 2728 to
the LinuxBIOS source repository and caused the following
changes:
Change Log:
Artec Group dbe61 mainboard support.
Now uses CAR.
New code for SPD-less memory
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 05:50:05PM -0600, Marc Jones wrote:
Add Artec Group dbe61 mainboard.
Uses norwich defaults for the payloads.
Signed-off-by: Marc Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Peter Stuge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 11:23:23AM -0300, Augusto Pedroza wrote:
Please feel free to suggest anything.
Well, I'll once again say that I think the ARC specification seems
interesting. But I assume FREELDR people will already know all those
details. :)
http://www.linuxbios.org/Download_LinuxBIOS
The download the most current snapshot directly link is broken for me
at least, it leads to this page:
http://www.openbios.org/viewcvs/trunk/LinuxBIOSv2.tar.gz?view=tar and
should lead to this one:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 12:23:17AM -0400, Corey Osgood wrote:
(note viewvc vs viewcvs)
Thanks, fixed now!
//Peter
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
31 matches
Mail list logo
