Hi,
On Sat, Sep 15, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> > --snip--
> > video:~# lspci -vs $(lspci|grep EHCI|cut -f1 -d' ')
> > 00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-M) USB2
> > EHCI Controller (rev 02) (prog-if 20 [EHCI])
> > Subsystem: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBM (ICH4/ICH
I need recommendation for Dual-core supported motherboard to try linuxBIOS on.
Appreciate your time.
-
Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha!
Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxb
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 04:53:17PM -0600, Myles Watson wrote:
> 2. Backport Filo's driver
>
> I started #2.
Please don't spend time on the FILO IDE driver. It's a mess and not
worth the effort.
Instead I'd suggest the OpenBIOS IDE driver, which is much nicer.
> To build it, replace your rombio
> I'd like to help with ADLO, could give me some more details when you try
to boot using ADLO?
It's pretty unspectacular. The error message is:
ata0 master: Unknown device
It won't even try to boot.
Myles
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/l
> Myles Watson wrote:
> > With some fiddling I booted into the Windows install CD and installed
> > Windows XP on a hard drive. It took fiddling because the BIOS is so old
> > that it doesn't conform to the ATA-3 specifications.
> >
> > I haven't been able to boot using a hard drive from ADLO yet
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:44:26PM +0200, Dieter Bloms wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Sep 14, Uwe Hermann wrote:
>
> > Fixed in the wiki, thanks!
> >
> > I was the one who added the ICH4 in the wiki, but I don't remember which
> > system I used to test that back then. Maybe I confused it with
> > some
This is great,
I'd like to help with ADLO, could give me some more details when you try
to boot using ADLO?
Thanks,
Augusto Pedroza
On 9/14/07, Stefan Reinauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Myles Watson wrote:
> > With some fiddling I booted into the Windows install CD and installed
> > Wind
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 14, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> Fixed in the wiki, thanks!
>
> I was the one who added the ICH4 in the wiki, but I don't remember which
> system I used to test that back then. Maybe I confused it with
> some other chipset or I was drunk or something ;-)
hmm, may system has no debug po
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 03:49:18PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> But I found that the board has a feature called CrashFree BIOS 2,
> where the board flashes the BIOS by itself, when something is wrong
> [1, page 73 or 4-4].
>
> Has anybody experience with this feature? Or does it get deleted
> when
Myles Watson wrote:
> With some fiddling I booted into the Windows install CD and installed
> Windows XP on a hard drive. It took fiddling because the BIOS is so old
> that it doesn't conform to the ATA-3 specifications.
>
> I haven't been able to boot using a hard drive from ADLO yet because it
>
With some fiddling I booted into the Windows install CD and installed
Windows XP on a hard drive. It took fiddling because the BIOS is so old
that it doesn't conform to the ATA-3 specifications.
I haven't been able to boot using a hard drive from ADLO yet because it
doesn't recognize my hard driv
Uwe Hermann wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
...
>> I suspect that this is the SPD address is different.
>
> How do I find out the correct one? i2cdetect/i2cdump?
>
>
> Uwe.
I think that a scan with i2cdump would be your best bet.
Marc
--
Marc Jones
Senior Firmware Engineer
(970) 226-9684 Office
mailt
Jouni Mettälä wrote:
> I tried to flash. MS-6337 with recently added MS-6178. It was needed
> to put WP# and TBL# pins to high but since another chip is in use it
> is ok.
>
> With filo as payload, post card gave 10 ... pause... 80, f8, fe
> ..short pause and ff. (+ some other codes between them)
I tried to flash. MS-6337 with recently added MS-6178. It was needed to put
WP# and TBL# pins to high but since another chip is in use it is ok.
With filo as payload, post card gave 10 ... pause... 80, f8, fe ..short
pause and ff. (+ some other codes between them)
So at least ram is ok I think.
Quoting Tom Sylla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> So, I should just need to clear any parity and serr errors after
>> pci_bus_enable_resources() function runs but before the
>> pci_dev_enable_resources() function runs. Like this:
>
> Well, my suggestion was only to try t
Uwe Hermann wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 05:45:18PM +0200, LinuxBIOS information wrote:
>
>> Compilation of newisys:khepri has been broken
>> See the error log at
>> http://qa.linuxbios.org/log_buildbrd.php?revision=2776&device=khepri&vendor=newisys
>>
>
> "too few registers". Maybe th
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 10:37:08PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 08:12:27PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> > * Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070908 00:30]:
> > > + $(Q)# On Debian GNU/kFreeBSD we need the linker output format
> > > + $(Q)# 'elf32-i386-freebsd' instead of j
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 10:49:03PM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> On http://linuxbios.org/EHCI_Debug_Port wiki page there is an info that
> Intel ICH4/ICH4-M chipset does not supports Debug Port. I have Dell D400
> laptop with that chipset and Debug Port is available according to lspci
> out
On 9/14/07, Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 05:45:18PM +0200, LinuxBIOS information wrote:
> > Compilation of newisys:khepri has been broken
> > See the error log at
> > http://qa.linuxbios.org/log_buildbrd.php?revision=2776&device=khepri&vendor=newisys
>
> "too fe
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 06:22:39PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> Thanks, but it's already committed in r2772, Corey ACKed that in
> a different thread too, and I forgot to reply here...
Doh. I looked for it in my tree but forgot to svn up.
//Peter
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.or
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 06:43:37PM -0400, Tom Sylla wrote:
> Hm, what about at least a tiny update to README that says that
> menuconfig is available? (it currently says to use oldconfig)
Good point. Done.
Uwe.
--
http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de
http://www.crazy-hacks
Author: uwe
Date: 2007-09-14 18:28:23 +0200 (Fri, 14 Sep 2007)
New Revision: 37
Modified:
buildrom-devel/README
Log:
Mention 'make menuconfig' in the README (trivial).
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Modified: buildrom-devel/README
==
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 05:45:18PM +0200, LinuxBIOS information wrote:
> Compilation of newisys:khepri has been broken
> See the error log at
> http://qa.linuxbios.org/log_buildbrd.php?revision=2776&device=khepri&vendor=newisys
"too few registers". Maybe this can be quick-fixed by disabling some
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 03:08:56PM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
> > > How would this be used by a mainboard?
> >
> > Pretty much like this:
> > http://tracker.linuxbios.org/trac/LinuxBIOS/changeset/2772
> >
> > Instead of the usual Config.lb blurb to use the local failover.c
> > you change it to use
Rasmus Wiman wrote:
> "Marc Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The register documents have not been released. As Rasmus pointed out,
>> the datasheets that have been released don't contain the registers.
>> Marc
>
> Are you held back by legal stuff or is it just the fact that it's of
> ATI
"Marc Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The register documents have not been released. As Rasmus pointed out,
> the datasheets that have been released don't contain the registers.
> Marc
Are you held back by legal stuff or is it just the fact that it's of
ATI origin? Also, is ACPI done by some
Dear LinuxBIOS readers!
This is the automated build check service of LinuxBIOS.
The developer "stepan" checked in revision 2776 to
the LinuxBIOS source repository and caused the following
changes:
Change Log:
More range for HT_CHAIN_UNITID_BASE and HT_CHAIN_END_UNITID_BASE.
For example: in C51
Rasmus Wiman wrote:
> "Darmawan Salihun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev:
>
>> hmmm, can be downloaded from:
>>
>> http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/TechnicalResources/0,,30_182_739_15137,00.html
>>
>> But, I don't know how complete the datasheet over there ;-).
>
> I had a look at the 690 stuff. I
Author: stepan
Date: 2007-09-14 16:58:33 +0200 (Fri, 14 Sep 2007)
New Revision: 2776
Modified:
trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/src/devices/hypertransport.c
trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/src/northbridge/amd/amdk8/early_ht.c
trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/src/northbridge/amd/amdk8/incoherent_ht.c
trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/src/northbr
Hi,
testing my mainboard ASUS P4C800-E Deluxe with flashrom, Uwe told me
also to try to write to it and to have a backup chip. I am a little bit
fearfull.
But I found that the board has a feature called CrashFree BIOS 2, where
the board flashes the BIOS by itself, when something is wrong [1, pag
Am Freitag, den 14.09.2007, 14:58 +0200 schrieb Uwe Hermann:
> Have you done that? If not, please make sure you have a backup chip
> in case something goes wrong. You can try writing the vendor's BIOS
> (e.g. from the website) via flashrom, that should tell you if it works.
Oh, sorry. It looks li
"Darmawan Salihun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev:
> hmmm, can be downloaded from:
>
> http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/TechnicalResources/0,,30_182_739_15137,00.html
>
> But, I don't know how complete the datasheet over there ;-).
I had a look at the 690 stuff. It looked like it mainly contained
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 03:01:17PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 01:52:55PM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 03:25:46PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> > > Add a common/global failover.c file which can be used by all
> > > (or at least most) mainboards.
> >
>
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 01:52:55PM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 03:25:46PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> > Add a common/global failover.c file which can be used by all
> > (or at least most) mainboards.
>
> How would this be used by a mainboard?
Pretty much like this:
http://
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 12:41:15PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> I have an ASUS P4C800-E Deluxe mainboard. This is what flashrom says.
>
> $ sudo flashrom
> Calibrating delay loop... ok
> No LinuxBIOS table found.
> Found chipset "ICH5/ICH5R": Enabling flash write... OK.
> Pm49FL004 found at physica
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So, I should just need to clear any parity and serr errors after
> pci_bus_enable_resources() function runs but before the
> pci_dev_enable_resources() function runs. Like this:
Well, my suggestion was only to try that as a debug tactic. PERR or SERR
set is probably
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 03:25:46PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> Add a common/global failover.c file which can be used by all
> (or at least most) mainboards.
How would this be used by a mainboard?
//Peter
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinf
Hallo Liste,
Am Freitag, den 14.09.2007, 11:24 +0200 schrieb Uwe Hermann:
> Please add more verified boards to the list (or post them here and I'll
> add them).
I have an ASUS P4C800-E Deluxe mainboard. This is what flashrom says.
$ sudo flashrom
Calibrating delay loop... ok
No LinuxBIOS table
Hi,
please checkout http://linuxbios.org/Flashrom#Supported_mainboards.
I've added a section where we can collect a list of known-good and
known-bad mainboards, i.e.
- those which support flashrom out of the box (given that chipset and
ROM chip are supported)
- those that support flashrom
Hi Marc,
(CC to list)
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 06:33:17PM -0600, Marc Jones wrote:
> Uwe Hermann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> here's my first try with the K9N. It took me a while to figure out how
>> to make serial work (the Super I/O is at 0x4e on this board, and you
>> need a small hack to switch to 24MH
FYI:
/* i82801er has this commented out, wonder why? */
/* System error enable */
reg32 = pci_read_config32(dev, 0x04);
reg32 |= (1 << 8); /* SERR# Enable */
reg32 |= (1 << 6); /* Parity Error Response */
pci_write_config32(dev, 0x04, reg32);
I don't know about the i82801er, but as far
Hi all,
On 9/14/07, Darmawan Salihun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> On 9/10/07, Marc Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > ...
> > Hi Darmawan,
> > Currently there is no support in LinuxBIOS for any ATI(now AMD)
> > chipsets. We do plan to work on this in the next six months but I
Hi Mark,
On 9/10/07, Marc Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ...
> Hi Darmawan,
> Currently there is no support in LinuxBIOS for any ATI(now AMD)
> chipsets. We do plan to work on this in the next six months but I don't
> have a specific release date.
>
Is it possible for us here to obtain the
43 matches
Mail list logo