Quoting Corey Osgood [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 03:54:18PM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:42:00AM -0500, Corey Osgood wrote:
Peter Stuge wrote:
I think we need to make it configurable.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 04:34:39AM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 09:34:28PM -0500, Corey Osgood wrote:
How many different cores could you put in even the most popular
socket, three?
LGA775 currently has 19 (and may have more I don't know about).
Using some rough
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 09:36:20PM -0500, Corey Osgood wrote:
Both patches Signed-off-by: Corey Osgood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I checked that this doesn't break abuild, so far so good.
On which hardware has this been tested so far? I'm reluctant to commit
this without some broader testing on actual
Quoting Corey Osgood [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
On 11.01.2008 02:33, Corey Osgood wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Corey Osgood [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Do you mean the microcode files? If so, the microcode update looks like
this:
Header
Update Revision
Date
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:42:00AM -0500, Corey Osgood wrote:
Peter Stuge wrote:
I think we need to make it configurable.
I don't like that. With a factory bios, you expect the correct
microcode update for your CPU to be present, no matter what CPU you
put in a socket.
(Actually no, not
Peter Stuge wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 09:34:28PM -0500, Corey Osgood wrote:
How many different cores could you put in even the most popular
socket, three?
LGA775 currently has 19 (and may have more I don't know about).
Using some rough math, I get a rounded-down size of 186KB
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 03:54:18PM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:42:00AM -0500, Corey Osgood wrote:
Peter Stuge wrote:
I think we need to make it configurable.
I don't like that. With a factory bios, you expect the correct
microcode update for your CPU to be
note that on V3, we have the neat ability to put microcode in LAR, and
find it there on boot.
So we might have another top level directory: /microcode
And then you can figure out, long after the bios is built, which
microcode updates you want to support.
ron
--
linuxbios mailing list
Quoting Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 03:54:18PM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:42:00AM -0500, Corey Osgood wrote:
Peter Stuge wrote:
I think we need to make it configurable.
I don't like that. With a factory bios, you expect the correct
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 05:27:48PM -0800, ron minnich wrote:
note that on V3, we have the neat ability to put microcode in LAR,
and find it there on boot.
So we might have another top level directory: /microcode
And then you can figure out, long after the bios is built, which
microcode
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 03:54:18PM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:42:00AM -0500, Corey Osgood wrote:
Peter Stuge wrote:
I think we need to make it configurable.
I
Quoting Corey Osgood [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Corey Osgood [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've separated this into two patches, one code and one microcode, to
improve readability, but they would both have to be committed at once
(else things break). These patches eliminate a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Corey Osgood [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Corey Osgood [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've separated this into two patches, one code and one microcode, to
improve readability, but they would both have to be committed at once
(else things break).
On 11.01.2008 02:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Do you see any way to solve the size problem for sockets with too many
different cores?
Not sure what you mean? How many different cores could you put in even
the most popular socket, three?
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
On 11.01.2008 02:33, Corey Osgood wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Corey Osgood [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Do you mean the microcode files? If so, the microcode update looks like
this:
Header
Update Revision
Date
Processor
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 09:34:28PM -0500, Corey Osgood wrote:
How many different cores could you put in even the most popular
socket, three?
LGA775 currently has 19 (and may have more I don't know about).
Using some rough math, I get a rounded-down size of 186KB (really
is quite a bit
Quoting Corey Osgood [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've separated this into two patches, one code and one microcode, to
improve readability, but they would both have to be committed at once
(else things break). These patches eliminate a lot of repeated code,
make porting and adding new CPUs easier, add
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Corey Osgood [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've separated this into two patches, one code and one microcode, to
improve readability, but they would both have to be committed at once
(else things break). These patches eliminate a lot of repeated code,
make porting
18 matches
Mail list logo
