On 12/11/07, ron minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use a script to set DIVIL_BALLS FWIW.
but auto sensing? Never worked for me. Is it really possible?
Dave Frodin of AMD replied on the Geode mailing list (talking about
how their non-free gx_util.c and closed-source AMD flashrom work):
In
ron minnich wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007 2:42 PM, Martin-Éric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In regards to the DIVIL_BALL settings. FlashROM checks to see what device
was
booted from (i.e. LPC, flash controller) before the flash device is
identified. If the
boot device is the flash
On 12/13/07, Marc Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ron minnich wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007 2:42 PM, Martin-Éric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In regards to the DIVIL_BALL settings. FlashROM checks to see what
device was
booted from (i.e. LPC, flash controller) before the flash device is
Thank you for your quick reply!
On 12/10/07, Tom Sylla [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 9, 2007 4:15 PM, Martin-Éric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I can tell, 'flashrom' would need to read some register
(DIVIL_BALLS - see AMD document 3328G_cs5536_db.pdf page 365) to learn
what
I use a script to set DIVIL_BALLS FWIW.
but auto sensing? Never worked for me. Is it really possible?
ron
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On 10/12/07 16:45 +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
Right now, we're forced to use a deprecated hack from AMD called
gx_util.c (a non-free kernel module whose only purpose is to play with
the MSR) to flip the register. We even ended up having to hack a
slightly different version of this module
On Dec 11, 2007 2:42 PM, Martin-Éric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In regards to gx_util usage, /dev/mem will not work for accesses to the
very top of
memory. I believe it will not allow access to the top 64k bytes of memory.
Which is
fine unless you want to modify the system BIOS.
On Dec 9, 2007 4:15 PM, Martin-Éric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I can tell, 'flashrom' would need to read some register
(DIVIL_BALLS - see AMD document 3328G_cs5536_db.pdf page 365) to learn
what is the primary boot device configured by the bootstrap resistors
and then try to
Greetings,
I was wondering if anybody ever managed to get the current LinuxBIOS
'flashrom' utility to correctly detect the location of the BIOS chip
with a Geode LX and CS5536?
Here, I have two platforms with slightly different settings:
platform 1: NOR chip on the flash controller.
platform 2:
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 11:15:45PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
As far as I can tell, 'flashrom' would need to read some register
(DIVIL_BALLS - see AMD document 3328G_cs5536_db.pdf page 365)
..
Is the LinuxBIOS 'flashrom' currently incapable of doing this
Well, it doesn't do it. But it
Yep, let's do it. Does the board have a socketed BIOS so you can
hot-swap it to have a backup chip stored away safely?
The BIOS is a socketed chip yes (a PLCC, don't know what type).
I need a replacement chip first so I can back-up the original.
Please send the output of 'lspci -tvnn' and
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 10:35:34AM +0100, Dijk, Michiel van [FDS] wrote:
Yep, let's do it. Does the board have a socketed BIOS so you can
hot-swap it to have a backup chip stored away safely?
The BIOS is a socketed chip yes (a PLCC, don't know what type).
I need a replacement chip first
Hi,
I was wondering if LinuxBIOS would work on my Compaq ProLiant 1850R server. The
current Compaq BIOS lacks a lot of options.
I identified the following chips on the mainboard:
Super I/O: NSC PC87317
Northbridge: Intel FW82443BX
Southbridge: Intel FW82371EB
SCSI: Symbios LSI 53C876
Michiel van Dijk wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if LinuxBIOS would work on my Compaq ProLiant 1850R server.
The current Compaq BIOS lacks a lot of options.
The system itself is not supported yet, but all the components are. It
wouldn't be very hard to port it.
I identified the following
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:45:01AM -0500, Corey Osgood wrote:
SCSI: Symbios LSI 53C876 (on-board)
You'd have to extract the original option rom from the bios for
this, then prepend it to linuxbios. Explore around the wiki a bit,
there's a build guide for another board with a SCSI option
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:45:01AM -0500, Corey Osgood wrote:
I was wondering if LinuxBIOS would work on my Compaq ProLiant 1850R server.
The current Compaq BIOS lacks a lot of options.
The system itself is not supported yet, but all the components are. It
wouldn't be very hard to
Author: jcrouse
Date: 2007-11-28 18:59:40 +0100 (Wed, 28 Nov 2007)
New Revision: 59
Added:
buildrom-devel/packages/kernel/serengeti_cheetah-kernel-x86_64.mk
buildrom-devel/packages/linuxbios/patches/serengeti_cheetah-lab.patch
Hi,
On 10/25/07 18:54, Uwe Hermann wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 04:44:28PM +0200, Philip Schulz wrote:
[...]
Unfortunately, I have no idea how to detect FreeBSD from a Makefile or a
Python script. But maybe someone on this list knows and wants enhance
the patches so they can be included
Uwe Hermann wrote:
Btw, you mention in the wiki that VGA won't work. AFAIK it _should_
work
with the latest LinuxBIOSv2 version and the required (patched)
vgabios-cirrus.bin file in your $HOME (or whereever your bios.bin is
stored). Also, I know for sure that VGA works in v3, too. While v3
Am 25.10.2007 18:54, Uwe Hermann schrieb:
[...]
Please post all patches to the list, with a Signed-off-by:
http://linuxbios.org/index.php/Development_Guidelines#Sign-off_Procedure
Much easier to review that way, and we don't commit any patches which
are lacking a proper Signed-off-by line.
Am 26.10.2007 02:07, Peter Stuge schrieb:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 04:44:28PM +0200, Philip Schulz wrote:
I recently played around with LinuxBIOS and FreeBSD. In short, it
somewhat works in QEMU using ADLO
Cool!
Do you know the FBSD boot process internals well?
No, I'm still
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 08:14:35AM +0200, Philip Schulz wrote:
Can you please attach a license to that wiki page? Either GPL, or
Creative Commons, or public domain, anything free-ish will do.
There are wiki templates you can use, e.g. {{GPL}}, {{PD-self}} etc.
Done.
Thanks!
Btw, you mention
Hi,
I recently played around with LinuxBIOS and FreeBSD. In short, it
somewhat works in QEMU using ADLO, see [1]. While trying to build
LinuxBIOS and ADLO on FreeBSD, I came across some problems. They all
come from the assumption that make is GNU make which isn't true on
the BSDs. I've
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 04:44:28PM +0200, Philip Schulz wrote:
I recently played around with LinuxBIOS and FreeBSD. In short, it
somewhat works in QEMU using ADLO
Cool!
Do you know the FBSD boot process internals well?
I discussed this at Linuxforum.dk this spring with some FBSD people
and
IBM eServer xSeries 335
I would like to use the LinuxBIOS on the IBM eServer xSeries 335.
Below is the information I was able to capture regarding this server.
I included an ASCII simple motherboard diagram to provide an idea of the
integrated circuits location.
The letter leading most of
On 23.10.2007 19:19, Viktor Godard wrote:
I would like to use the LinuxBIOS on the IBM eServer xSeries 335.
Will be difficult to impossible. But see below.
CPU:
Socket type: mPGA 604 (x2)
CPU0:
On pins side: 2800DP/512/533/1.50V , SL6VN COSTA RICA, 3431A517-0534
On
I know, the LinuxBIOS Symposium 2007 canceled, but I get information from
Mr. Beck,\
in the 0sec Security Conference in Berne on 19th - 21st October,
where we will have a little LinuxBIOS Hackcenter.
I would like to ask, from the LinuxBIOS developers who will be participant
of this
Hi Henry,
Henry keultjes wrote:
Open BIOSes for Linux
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-bios.html
Marc:
Are you willing to provide some help/guidance getting LinuxBios
implemented on an Acer T180 with a dual core 2.1 Mhz Athlon?
Linux BIOS CPU support for the K8 (
Hello
Is it possible to use linuxbios on a ePC C10 computer ? it is using
Intel Whitney 82810E that is supported now by linuxbios.
The original bios take horrible long time to boot (~13 secondes to
get the HP splash screen).
Do you think the linuxbios can speedup the boot time or it is a
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 03:54:20AM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 04:16:32AM -0400, Robinson Tryon wrote:
It's great to hear that AMD is so supportive of this project.
..
laptop
This was discussed on IRC shortly after Mark's post. For now, the
Which post? URL?
On 9/25/07, Robert Vogel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doesn't someone make a motherboard with a socketed, replaceable BIOS ?
not really. it's far more common nowadays to pre-flash the chips
before they are soldered down. To reflash, you use the vendor program.
If it goes badly, the machine is a
OLPC (One Laptop Per Child) Buy 2 Get 1 Laptops are sold for the public. One
laptop is sent to the buyer and the other laptop is sent to a child in poor
developing country.
Unfortunately there is NO BIOS in OLPC, therefore public users cannot use
FreeDOS, BSD, AROS, Haiku, ReactOS etc.
Is it
big one wrote:
OLPC (One Laptop Per Child) Buy 2 Get 1 Laptops are sold for the public.
One laptop is sent to the buyer and the other laptop is sent to a child in
poor developing country.
This is great idea! I know there's been some demand for the XO in the US
market, this is a great way
On 9/25/07, Corey Osgood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
big one wrote:
OLPC (One Laptop Per Child) Buy 2 Get 1 Laptops are sold for the public.
One laptop is sent to the buyer and the other laptop is sent to a child in
poor developing country.
The 1-for-the-price-of-2 deal sounds socially
On 25/09/07 08:30 -0400, Robinson Tryon wrote:
Unless they have changed the hardware, I assume that LinuxBIOS could
be slipped right back in...
Only a new processor... :) Its going to take a goodly amount of work to
catch back up with what OFW has done, and even then, we'll be behind
since we
On 9/24/07, big one [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to port LinuxBIOS to OLPC laptops?
Oh, the irony :-)
ron
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
We ought to stop worrying about OLPC. Great kid machine, and admirable
purpose, and it will probably (we hope!) make good things happen
around the world. But a machine for you? I doubt it.
Impossible to use, for me, anyway. Kid-sized keyboard. And I find
Linux unusable in 128MB.
It would be an
On 9/24/07, ron minnich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it has to be an AMD laptop. Intel is just not gonna play at
this point, as far as I can tell.
Of course, we have to boot windows or find someone that does not care
about booting windows.
linux laptop as workstation ?
MSI or Arima
On 9/25/07, yhlu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MSI or Arima seems have one MCP55 based laptop...
we keep going in circles.
what we MUST have:
1. laptop
2. chipset that we understand
3. flash we can pull out
4. known good path to a display device -- vga connector is ok to
start, but panel drivers
Doesn't someone make a motherboard with a socketed, replaceable BIOS ? I
would think that it ought to be a standard tool for developers. A
prerequisite for an open machine.
Are there hiding places in the chipset too ? How closed are the chipsets ?
Bob
--
linuxbios mailing list
On 9/21/07, Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, AMD supports LinuxBIOS as one of the boot software options on
their systems. People at AMD work with LB. We think it is great of
course! :)
Full ACK! The support from AMD is really great and very appreciated!
Marvelous! It's great
On 10.09.2007 03:59, Danny Piccirillo wrote:
I'm sure some of you are aware that LinuxBIOS appeared on Dell's IdeaStorm
website. At some point the status was set to ***ACKNOWLEDGED*** by a Dell
admin but has since been removed.
http://www.ideastorm.com/article/show/62549 Maybe we can build up
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
On 10.09.2007 03:59, Danny Piccirillo wrote:
I'm sure some of you are aware that LinuxBIOS appeared on Dell's IdeaStorm
website. At some point the status was set to ***ACKNOWLEDGED*** by a Dell
admin but has since been removed.
Well the more support people show
and the more we can expand upon the idea
to show Dell how it could be beneficial for them and their customers
the better the chance of seeing it actually go somewhere
Every comment makes a difference
On 9/24/07, Corey Osgood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carl-Daniel
I think it has to be an AMD laptop. Intel is just not gonna play at
this point, as far as I can tell.
Would be interesting to get Shuttleworth, AMD, this group, and a
vendor together. The key thing is you have to make a business case.
Businesses are averse to doing things for what they see as
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 04:16:32AM -0400, Robinson Tryon wrote:
It's great to hear that AMD is so supportive of this project.
..
laptop
This was discussed on IRC shortly after Mark's post. For now, the
graphics hardware simply isn't there to serve this market.
LB can run the binary VGA BIOS in
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 01:08:40AM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
I just ran across an FSF web page in support of LinuxBIOS, and on
that page the FSF suggests writing directly to Intel:
http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/supportlinuxbios.html
Send e-mail to Intel, asking them to cooperate with a
On 9/19/07, Peter Stuge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 07:04:01PM -0400, Corey Osgood wrote:
Robinson Tryon wrote:
Would writing to Intel (if only to be counted as one more data
point) help at all?
No.
I just ran across an FSF web page in support of LinuxBIOS, and on
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 06:18:28PM -0400, Robinson Tryon wrote:
Would writing to Intel (if only to be counted as one more
data point) help at all?
No.
I just ran across an FSF web page in support of LinuxBIOS, and on
that page the FSF suggests writing directly to Intel:
One thing I'd like to investigate as well is initializing the IRQ router in
LB. I've seen some discussion about this in the past, and I've come to the
conclusion that for Geode GX1/CS5530 systems, it should be initialized in
LB rather than Linux. It also seems like some LB ports do this,
Hiya,
I'm in the market for a new laptop on which to run Ubuntu, and
Lenovo's Thinkpads look like a good choice.
I like the idea of running an open BIOS, but looking at past posts to
the mailing list, it appears that certain chipsets (such as those for
the T60) are not supported:
Steffen D. schrieb:
Did anybody have this problem before???
sorry wrong topic :)
It works quite good with the current buildrom! :)
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 03:49:14PM -0400, Robinson Tryon wrote:
I'm in the market for a new laptop on which to run Ubuntu, and
Lenovo's Thinkpads look like a good choice.
I like the idea of running an open BIOS, but looking at past posts to
the mailing list, it appears that certain chipsets
Steffen D. wrote:
Did anybody have this problem before???
Can you please do at least me, if not everyone, a favor and leave some
sort of quote of what you're responding to? Most email clients should
have that capability, but the threading in Thunderbird and gmail alike
is pretty terrible. Some
On 9/18/07, Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Correct. No laptop whatsoever (except for the OLPC) is supported by
LinuxBIOS at the moment. We definately like to change that, but at the
moment there's no support at all.
...
...
The last chipset which was added was the Intel 810.
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 10:30:27PM -0700, embedded linux wrote:
DecTOP (AMD PIC) is selling for $99 or (4 for $297)
http://www.dataevolution.com/dectop%20info%202.htm
Since this is similar to OLPC hardware, I assume this is supported? Anyone
has any experience with this hardware?
On 13/09/07 10:25 +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 10:30:27PM -0700, embedded linux wrote:
DecTOP (AMD PIC) is selling for $99 or (4 for $297)
http://www.dataevolution.com/dectop%20info%202.htm
Since this is similar to OLPC hardware, I assume this is
On 13/09/07 17:31 +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 09:00:18AM -0600, Jordan Crouse wrote:
There's a clever hardware hack to get around that by intercepting
the DDC lines on the VGA, though, if you are really interested
Oh - so that's part of the 5535? I thought it was
DecTOP (AMD PIC) is selling for $99 or (4 for $297)
http://www.dataevolution.com/dectop%20info%202.htm
Since this is similar to OLPC hardware, I assume this is supported? Anyone has
any experience with this hardware?
Please forgive me this dicussion has happened before.
Thanks,
Krane
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 10:11:07PM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 09:41:05PM +0200, Marc-André Beck wrote:
We are planning to have the summit at two locations in Switzerland.
Biel October 17th-19th(afternoon) and Berne 19th(night)-21st.
I'm going to miss this one,
Have you done these alterations already?
Also try booting your windows installation CD with qemu default's BIOS and
let me know the result please.
Thanks,
Augusto Pedroza
I've tried your fixes. I'm trying to boot on a real machine, so I can't use
qemu's BIOS. I'll keep trying.
Myles
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 03:44:09PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 10:11:07PM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 09:41:05PM +0200, Marc-André Beck wrote:
We are planning to have the summit at two locations in Switzerland.
Biel October 17th-19th(afternoon)
Ward Vandewege wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 03:44:09PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 10:11:07PM +0200, Peter Stuge wrote:
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 09:41:05PM +0200, Marc-André Beck wrote:
We are planning to have the summit at two locations in Switzerland.
I'm sure some of you are aware that LinuxBIOS appeared on Dell's IdeaStorm
website. At some point the status was set to ***ACKNOWLEDGED*** by a Dell
admin but has since been removed.
http://www.ideastorm.com/article/show/62549 Maybe we can build up support
for this idea again?
--
linuxbios
Danny Piccirillo wrote:
I'm sure some of you are aware that LinuxBIOS appeared on Dell's
IdeaStorm website. At some point the status was set to
***ACKNOWLEDGED*** by a Dell admin but has since been removed.
http://www.ideastorm.com/article/show/62549 Maybe we can build up
support for this
http://www.linuxbios.org/Booting_Windows_using_LinuxBIOS
Feel free to test it and give some feedback!!
I can get it to find my CD-ROM drive, but it fails with code: 0003.
According to http://bochs.sourceforge.net/doc/docbook/user/bios-tips.html
that means:
For this error, the cdrom support
Hi Myles,
in the xpboot.diff the following alterations should be made:
In the file:
util/ADLO/loader.s
comment out or remove the lines 177 until 180:
;mov al, #0x3d ;; cmos_reg
;out 0x70, al
;mov al, #0x02 ;; val (hdd)
;out 0x71, al
In the file:
util/ADLO/bochs/bios/rombios.c
uncomment
* Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070830 01:51]:
I'd say it should accept a lar archive via serial console, perhaps using
ymodem, and start executing the first member of the lar.
I really like the idea. BUT: The one thing that seems unclear is where
would we store that lar archive?
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 11:38:05AM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
I really like the idea. BUT: The one thing that seems unclear is
where would we store that lar archive? On the BIOS chip? RAM seems
no option as it is not initialized yet.
Good point.
How usable is the CAR? I guess either the
On 04.09.2007 11:38, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
* Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070830 01:51]:
I'd say it should accept a lar archive via serial console, perhaps using
ymodem, and start executing the first member of the lar.
I really like the idea. BUT: The one thing that seems
* Peter Stuge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070905 01:29]:
How usable is the CAR? I guess either the download will in fact write
to flash immediately (bad idea!) or only initram would be downloaded
first, and then the full lar.
Why would that be a bad idea? I think writing the flash directly (except
On 05.09.2007 01:40, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
* Peter Stuge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070905 01:29]:
How usable is the CAR? I guess either the download will in fact write
to flash immediately (bad idea!) or only initram would be downloaded
first, and then the full lar.
Why would that be a bad idea?
Greetings,
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
On 05.09.2007 01:40, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
* Peter Stuge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070905 01:29]:
How usable is the CAR? I guess either the download will in fact write
to flash immediately (bad idea!) or only initram would be
- Original Message -
From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: todthgie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: LinuxBIOS Mailing List linuxbios@linuxbios.org
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 23:55
Subject: Re: [LinuxBIOS] LinuxBIOS panic room
Hi,
On 30.08.2007 21:59, todthgie wrote:
for some
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 04:25:41PM +0200, todthgie wrote:
So you use romcc?
yes and im having LOADS of trouble
romcc is not actively maintained, so it's not in great shape.
Besides, most of the code was assembly anyway.. :)
//Peter
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
Hi,
On 30.08.2007 21:59, todthgie wrote:
for some time now i have a bootloader in my howbrew rom emulator that can
read / write to memory in on a byte basis and on a block basis using iHex
for the block ones
i have adapted it it to run on the pc in porting LB to right now. it can
erase
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 01:05:32PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
Can we invert the speaker line each time a byte is written out over
serial?
Great idea!
May need some more code for polling the UART status register though.
//Peter
--
linuxbios mailing list
linuxbios@linuxbios.org
On 30.08.2007 06:19, ron minnich wrote:
On 8/29/07, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say it should accept a lar archive via serial console, perhaps using
ymodem, and start executing the first member of the lar.
A bit more detailed: If the BIOS fails to verify its checksum,
: linuxbios@linuxbios.org
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 06:19
Subject: Re: [LinuxBIOS] LinuxBIOS panic room
On 8/29/07, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'd say it should accept a lar archive via serial console, perhaps using
ymodem, and start executing the first member of the lar
On 29.08.2007 23:28, Peter Stuge wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 04:43:27PM -0400, pyro wrote:
Agreed. That way, we could even abuse a fallback image for early
porting without the need to reflash continuously.
Yes - this has been a thought of mine all the way since the
Symposium.
I've been
On 8/29/07, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say it should accept a lar archive via serial console, perhaps using
ymodem, and start executing the first member of the lar.
A bit more detailed: If the BIOS fails to verify its checksum, it
outputs a message telling you about
Dear Mailinglist,
im trying to build a bios for GeodeLX cpu. I have a development board
from LogicPC. Afaik this is the same board that was used for the
development for OLCP.
I try it with the svn version Linuxbios-3. I have made a image with make
menuconfig and configured everything cleary
Hy guys,
While trying to boot vista installation DVD using linuxBIOS/qemu I got the
following:
LinuxBIOS-3.0.0 Mon Jul 30 20:36:58 BRT 2007 starting...
Choosing fallback boot.
LAR: Attempting to open 'fallback/initram'.
LAR: Start 0xfffc len 0x4
LAR: current filename is normal/initram
A bios enables/disables CPU extensions that determines what can be used once
the os is loaded.
I wonder why they did disable it, i don;t think they have more expensive
boards with it enabled, it just seems bizarre especially with virtualization
being a hot topic.
In regard to me and spi , ive not
What you say is a little bit surprising to me: I tought that the AMD-V (or SVM
if you like..) extension cannot be disabled permanently (contrary to Intel)..
The technical documents of AMD say that the virtualization is enabled by
setting the bit 12 into the EFER MSR register. In my understanding
Could you help us on understanding if our system architecture is Linuxbios
compliant?
Below the info you required.
Please let us know if you need more details.
Thank you in advance,
Matteo
Step 1: A very brief description of your system: CPU and mainboard and
optionally other important
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 04:40:14PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you help us on understanding if our system architecture is
Linuxbios compliant?
I'm afraid it is not.
Step 1: A very brief description of your system: CPU and mainboard
and optionally other important details.
PC
Peter Stuge wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 04:40:14PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Step 1: A very brief description of your system: CPU and mainboard
and optionally other important details.
PC based portable device with Intel Celeron 800MHz 0 cache CPU, Intel
915GM north bridge and
Hello all,
I am quite new to this MLL as well as LinuxBIOS itself. I
do know that there have been some discusions (2 yrs ago)
about this, but those seemed to drift away a bit.
AMD came out a few years back with a tiny SBC that they
called PIC (Personal Internet Communicator), as one of the
first
On Thursday 21 June 2007 22:47, Brendan Trotter wrote:
I had the exact same problem (gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 (Gentoo 4.1.2), GNU
assembler 2.16.1, GNU ld version 2.16.1).
So it seems its more a Gentoo related problem.
As far as I can tell binutils is mostly broken for 16-bit code and
different
On Thursday 21 June 2007 19:28, todthgie wrote:
i tried building LinuxBios V3 but it fails..
any suggestions ?
I tried the same revision (364) fresh from the repository and in a second step
with your archive:
Hostcompiler: gcc 4.0.3, binutils 2.16.1
Crosscompiler: gcc 4.1.1, binutils 2.17
Hi,
On 6/21/07, todthgie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i tried building LinuxBios V3 but it fails..
any suggestions ?
snip
/home/reinder/proj/lbv3/LinuxBIOSv3/build/arch/x86/stage0_i586.o: In
function `_stage0':
/home/reinder/proj/lbv3/LinuxBIOSv3/arch/x86/stage0_i586.S:(.text+0xf):
: [LinuxBIOS] LinuxBios V3 build failure
Hi,
On 6/21/07, todthgie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i tried building LinuxBios V3 but it fails..
any suggestions ?
snip
/home/reinder/proj/lbv3/LinuxBIOSv3/build/arch/x86/stage0_i586.o: In
function `_stage0':
/home/reinder/proj/lbv3/LinuxBIOSv3/arch
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 11:03:15AM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
Thank you very much to all people contributing their time and
effort here at the booth to make this possible
I second that. Many thanks to Carsten, Stefan, Uwe and Jens!
Also a big thank you to the LinuxTag organizers working
Hi there,
The LinuxBIOS booth at the Linux Tag in Berlin is a great success. Thank
you very much to all people contributing their time and effort here at
the booth to make this possible, and thank you very much to all
visitors. It has been a couple of very nice and successful days for the
Stefan Reinauer wrote:
Hi there,
The LinuxBIOS booth at the Linux Tag in Berlin is a great success. Thank
you very much to all people contributing their time and effort here at
the booth to make this possible, and thank you very much to all
visitors. It has been a couple of very nice and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings,
I would just like to point out that Artec Design is a daughter company
of Artec Group, thus the wiki entry for our DBE61 should read:
Artec Group [www.artecgroup.com] runs LinuxBIOS on their Geode LX
- -based DBE61 ThinCan
Hi,
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 02:08:30PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
I would just like to point out that Artec Design is a daughter company
of Artec Group, thus the wiki entry for our DBE61 should read:
Artec Group [www.artecgroup.com] runs LinuxBIOS on their Geode LX
- -based DBE61
Uwe Hermann kirjoitti:
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 02:08:30PM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
I would just like to point out that Artec Design is a daughter company
of Artec Group, thus the wiki entry for our DBE61 should read:
Artec Group [www.artecgroup.com] runs LinuxBIOS on their Geode LX
Hi,
I own a commell lv-671 board and want to install a linuxbios, because of
supporting serial console.
I successfully made a qemu bios and it works as aspected
From the source I see, that the i82801db and i855pm is supported.
Is the i855pm compatible to i855GME ?
Or does anybody have
1 - 100 of 361 matches
Mail list logo
