Marc,
On Wednesday 03 October 2007 18:46, Marc Jones wrote:
Glad it worked. I don't know enough about the kernel to know if the
failed message is important. It seems to have a fallback mechanism. I
also haven't followed the 5530 kernel patch debate. Maybe someone else
here has the knowledge?
Jonathan,
You can use lspci to get that information.
lspci -xxxv or lspci -s 00:12.0 -xxxv for just device 0x12
Marc
Marc,
Well the steering bits are actually being set, and it does seem to work! What
threw me off (and I apologize for not testing this more) was the fact that with
a normal
- Original Message
From: Marc Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jonathan Sturges [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: LinuxBIOS mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 12:05:19 PM
Subject: Re: [LinuxBIOS] Two more CS5530 IRQ steering questions
Jonathan Sturges wrote
Jonathan Sturges wrote:
Two additional questions about CS5530 IRQ steering:
1) Comments from Uwe Hermann and Peter Stuge have indicated that it's
really better for the kernel to setup the steering registers. Why is this?
It sounds like the BIOS is a good place to set these. I assume
Jonathan Sturges wrote:
Jonathan Sturges wrote:
Two additional questions about CS5530 IRQ steering:
1) Comments from Uwe Hermann and Peter Stuge have indicated that it's
really better for the kernel to setup the steering registers. Why is this?
It sounds like the BIOS is a good place
Jonathan Sturges wrote:
Two additional questions about CS5530 IRQ steering:
1) Comments from Uwe Hermann and Peter Stuge have indicated that it's really
better for the kernel to setup the steering registers. Why is this? It
sounds like the BIOS is a good place to set these. I assume that
Two additional questions about CS5530 IRQ steering:
1) Comments from Uwe Hermann and Peter Stuge have indicated that it's really
better for the kernel to setup the steering registers. Why is this? It sounds
like the BIOS is a good place to set these. I assume that a knowledgeable OS
could
