Re: [LinuxBIOS] dualcore trouble with LB - opteron 175

2007-10-27 Thread ron minnich
On 10/27/07, Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nope, it has not, don't worry. It will be reviewed, fixed, acked and > committed. Thanks Uwe and everyone. You folks do an amazing job! ron -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbi

Re: [LinuxBIOS] dualcore trouble with LB - opteron 175

2007-10-27 Thread Uwe Hermann
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 10:13:47AM -0700, ron minnich wrote: > At the same time, I am sorry to see that Morgans' stuff > has fallen through the cracks. Nope, it has not, don't worry. It will be reviewed, fixed, acked and committed. It just a matter of enough spare time and reviewers, and also I'm

Re: [LinuxBIOS] dualcore trouble with LB - opteron 175

2007-10-27 Thread Rudolf Marek
> Is this board still available? Its on ebay. (they have like 60 boards) I think I will buy a spare one maybe ;) > If you don't get an ack soon from someone push me and I will do it. I > have not done much k8 recently (all geode) so I try to let other > experts ack. At the same time, I am sorry t

Re: [LinuxBIOS] dualcore trouble with LB - opteron 175

2007-10-27 Thread ron minnich
On 10/27/07, Rudolf Marek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ron minnich wrote: > > Great! What mainboard :-) > > Asus A8V-E SE, Is this board still available? > > I already published Northbridge patch, and southbridge yesterday. If you don't get an ack soon from someone push me and I will do it. I hav

Re: [LinuxBIOS] dualcore trouble with LB - opteron 175

2007-10-27 Thread Rudolf Marek
ron minnich wrote: > Great! What mainboard :-) Asus A8V-E SE, I already published Northbridge patch, and southbridge yesterday. Rudolf -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

Re: [LinuxBIOS] dualcore trouble with LB - opteron 175

2007-10-26 Thread ron minnich
Great! What mainboard :-) ron -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

Re: [LinuxBIOS] dualcore trouble with LB - opteron 175

2007-10-26 Thread Rudolf Marek
Hi All, Good news everyone, it works! The problem was that I did not put: allow_all_aps_stop(bsp_apicid); into my auto.c code. I did not knew about it :/ The core was never put to sleep and this error was never reached: print_initcpu8("while waiting for BSP signal to STOP, timeout i

Re: [LinuxBIOS] dualcore trouble with LB - opteron 175

2007-10-23 Thread Rudolf Marek
Please always post boot logs and debug output to the list, where it's archived. We want to be able to read up on old posts, problems, patches, discussions even in 5 five years from now... If the size does not matter I will. R. LinuxBIOS-2.0.0_Fallback Út říj 23 22:10:56 CEST 2007 starting.

Re: [LinuxBIOS] dualcore trouble with LB - opteron 175

2007-10-23 Thread Uwe Hermann
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 10:31:48PM +0200, Rudolf Marek wrote: > Hi all, > > >>> new boot log with log level = 8? > > http://assembler.cz/download/dc3.txt Random unrelated note: Please always post boot logs and debug output to the list, where it's archived. We want to be able to read up on old p

Re: [LinuxBIOS] dualcore trouble with LB - opteron 175

2007-10-23 Thread Rudolf Marek
Hi all, >>> new boot log with log level = 8? http://assembler.cz/download/dc3.txt > Check CONFIG_LOGICAL_CPUS=1 is set. I think that is the flag for > intializing aditional cores on each CPU. Yes it is correct, rest CPU related looks like this: default CONFIG_SMP=1 default CONFIG_MAX_CPUS=2

Re: [LinuxBIOS] dualcore trouble with LB - opteron 175

2007-10-23 Thread Marc Jones
Rudolf Marek wrote: > yhlu wrote: >> On 10/23/07, Rudolf Marek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> default ENABLE_APIC_EXT_ID=0 default APIC_ID_OFFSET=0x10 default LIFT_BSP_APIC_ID=0 >>> Thanks, it helped a bit. Now I have APIC ID 0x1 as I expected

Re: [LinuxBIOS] dualcore trouble with LB - opteron 175

2007-10-23 Thread Rudolf Marek
yhlu wrote: > On 10/23/07, Rudolf Marek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >>> default ENABLE_APIC_EXT_ID=0 >>> default APIC_ID_OFFSET=0x10 >>> default LIFT_BSP_APIC_ID=0 >>> >>> >> Thanks, it helped a bit. Now I have APIC ID 0x1 as I expected. >> But still same trouble :/ >>

Re: [LinuxBIOS] dualcore trouble with LB - opteron 175

2007-10-23 Thread yhlu
On 10/23/07, Rudolf Marek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > default ENABLE_APIC_EXT_ID=0 > > default APIC_ID_OFFSET=0x10 > > default LIFT_BSP_APIC_ID=0 > > > > Thanks, it helped a bit. Now I have APIC ID 0x1 as I expected. > But still same trouble :/ > new boot log with log level = 8? YH -

Re: [LinuxBIOS] dualcore trouble with LB - opteron 175

2007-10-23 Thread Rudolf Marek
Hello, > default ENABLE_APIC_EXT_ID=0 > default APIC_ID_OFFSET=0x10 > default LIFT_BSP_APIC_ID=0 > Thanks, it helped a bit. Now I have APIC ID 0x1 as I expected. But still same trouble :/ Rudolf -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linu

Re: [LinuxBIOS] dualcore trouble with LB - opteron 175

2007-10-22 Thread yhlu
On 10/22/07, Rudolf Marek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all, > > I have new CPU opteron 175 - sigle cpu dualcore, I'm not able to initialize AP > properly. > http://assembler.cz/download/minicom_dc.txt > > It seems I can boot them, but they never arrive to check point. > > Any idea what might

[LinuxBIOS] dualcore trouble with LB - opteron 175

2007-10-22 Thread Rudolf Marek
Hello all, I have new CPU opteron 175 - sigle cpu dualcore, I'm not able to initialize AP properly. http://assembler.cz/download/minicom_dc.txt It seems I can boot them, but they never arrive to check point. Any idea what might be wrong? Also I don't know why my core1 have APIC ID 0x11 instead