On Friday 30 May 2008 20:05, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
> And it seems our efforts bore fruit.India has filed an appeal
> too.Yoohoo!It's been put up as an update in the article mentioned
> by Praveen above.
http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20080530055633591
The farce c
Ravindra Jaju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Arun
Khan wrote:
> I think it is a case of incomplete proof reading.
>
> I have read the article and saw Dr. Phatak's name spelt correctly in 2
> places, only in the last instance did I notice the error.
>
> It happens.
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Praveen A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/5/24 Praveen A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > "The national body of South Africa (SABS), as a P member of JTC 1,
> > hereby submits an appeal against the outcome of the fast track
> > processing of DIS 29500 Office open XML.
>
2008/5/24 Praveen A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> "The national body of South Africa (SABS), as a P member of JTC 1,
> hereby submits an appeal against the outcome of the fast track
> processing of DIS 29500 Office open XML.
Brazil followed South Africa in standing upto ISO sellout.
http://www.groklaw.ne
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Arun Khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it is a case of incomplete proof reading.
>
> I have read the article and saw Dr. Phatak's name spelt correctly in 2
> places, only in the last instance did I notice the error.
>
> It happens. Have we not all, at one t
On Friday 30 May 2008, "Dinesh Joshi" wrote:
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 00:47:41 +0530
> From: "Dinesh Joshi"
> Subject: Re: [ILUG-BOM] [URL] IIT Bombay, Microsoft at loggerheads
>
> 2008/5/28 Ravindra Jaju <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Good to know IITB taking forward the good thing they ha
6 matches
Mail list logo
