Andrew Morton writes:
a) someone broke powerpc's kallsyms processing and
That would be h8300-kallsyms-exclude-local-symbols.patch, which
excludes symbols starting with '.' on all architectures, despite the
name of the patch.
Paul.
___
Linuxppc-dev
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 16:11:06 +1000 Paul Mackerras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton writes:
a) someone broke powerpc's kallsyms processing and
That would be h8300-kallsyms-exclude-local-symbols.patch, which
excludes symbols starting with '.' on all architectures, despite the
name of
This patch adds support for the AD7414 temperature sensor
on Sequoia PPC440EPx board.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Stefan Roese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/sequoia.dts |9 +
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git
Linus,
Please pull from the 'merge' branch of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulus/powerpc.git merge
There is one commit there from Hugh Dickins that fixes a build
problem, plus three from the Cell guys fixing a couple of races and a
reference count leak in
Some PowerPC 40x chips have errata that force us not to use the integrated
flow control. We have the feature defined, but it currently can't be used
because it is never added to EMAC_FTRS_POSSIBLE.
This adds a Kconfig option for affected platforms to select and puts the
feature in the
The PowerPC 405EZ SoC has some differences in the interrupt layout and
handling for the MAL. The SERR, TXDE, and RXDE interrupts are OR'd into
a single interrupt. Also, due to the possibility for interrupt coalescing,
the TXEOB and RXEOB interrupts require an interrupt bit to be cleared in
the
The following patch series adds things needed to support the PowerPC 405EZ
SoC. I've incorporated the suggestions and fixes from the previous round
of patches and barring any further comments these should be ready to go.
josh
Josh Boyer (3):
ibm_newemac: Allow the no flow control EMAC feature
There are some PowerPC SoCs that do odd things with the MAL handling. In
order to accommodate them, we need to introduce a feature mechanism that is
similar to the existing emac_has_feature function.
This adds a feature variable to the mal_instance structure, and adds a
mal_has_feature function.
On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 05:07:15PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
How about dtt? That's what we use in U-Boot for digital temperature
sensors as well.
I vote against any acronyms that are not very well known. Even knowing
that it's supposed to be digital temperature something, I can't
This patch series merges the 32 and 64-bit dma code and does some
other cleanup. This has changed a bit since the RFC was submitted
a few months ago - I incorporated most of the comments from Christoph,
including moving the iommu-specific code into its own file and dropping
numa_node from
32-bit platforms are about to start using dma.c; move the iommu
dma ops into their own file to make this a bit cleaner.
Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile|2 +-
arch/powerpc/kernel/dma-iommu.c | 103 +++
Use the struct device's numa_node instead; use accessor functions
to get/set numa_node.
Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
64-bit folks: Please test when you get a moment. I've build-tested this,
but I do not have the ability to actually boot it on anything. Yes, I know
this
This is in preparation for the merge of the 32 and 64-bit
dma code in arch/powerpc.
Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile |2 +-
arch/powerpc/kernel/dma.c| 200 ++
arch/powerpc/kernel/dma_64.c | 200
We essentially adopt the 64-bit dma code, with some changes to support
32-bit systems, including HIGHMEM. dma functions on 32-bit are now
invoked via accessor functions which call the correct op for a device based
on archdata dma_ops. If there is no archdata dma_ops, this defaults
to
Becky Bruce wrote:
This is in preparation for the merge of the 32 and 64-bit
dma code in arch/powerpc.
Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile |2 +-
arch/powerpc/kernel/dma.c| 200 ++
Becky Bruce wrote:
We're currently passing NULL, and really shouldn't be.
This patch doesn't change that for cpm2, since port.dev is never
initialized. :-P
Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_cpm2.c |6 +++---
drivers/serial/ucc_uart.c
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 02:18:42PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
Becky Bruce wrote:
This is in preparation for the merge of the 32 and 64-bit
dma code in arch/powerpc.
Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile |2 +-
arch/powerpc/kernel/dma.c| 200
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:55:26 -0700
Prodyut Hazarika [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Josh,
I am planning to submit a patch to support 4K/16K and 64K page size for 4xx
processors.
I see that your git tree still has the include/asm-powerpc/* header files,
while in Linus's git tree, the powerpc
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
I always thought that posting -M patches to the public lists is
discouraged since it is quite difficult to apply them via patch(1).
Also think of non-git users...
I think the substantially enhanced reviewability trumps non-git-users
who can follow the rename
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 04:38:57PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
I always thought that posting -M patches to the public lists is
discouraged since it is quite difficult to apply them via patch(1).
Also think of non-git users...
I think the substantially enhanced
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 02:09:53PM -0500, Becky Bruce wrote:
+/* We support DMA to/from any memory page via the iommu */
+static int dma_iommu_dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
+{
+ struct iommu_table *tbl = dev-archdata.dma_data;
+
+ if (!tbl || tbl-it_offset mask) {
+
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 01:27:17AM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
I always thought that posting -M patches to the public lists is
discouraged since it is quite difficult to apply them via patch(1).
Also think of non-git users...
Yes, it's a horrible idea.
- if (unlikely(dev == NULL || dev-archdata.dma_ops == NULL))
+
+ if (unlikely(dev == NULL) || dev-archdata.dma_ops == NULL) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
return NULL;
+#else
+ /* Use default on 32-bit if dma_ops is not set up */
+ return
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 14:42:33 -0700
Prodyut Hazarika [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Josh,
Thanks for your reply.
That was a bit old and I've updated it now to match the overallpowerpc.git
tree master branch
Thanks. I can see the changes now.
Generally, if you track my 'next' branch that
On Sep 08 2008, Rogério Brito wrote:
I just compiled a new 2.6.27-rc5 kernel for my standard Kurobox (an
embedded NAS that has an MPC8241 CPU, if I'm not mistaken) and upon
booting, I get these scary messages and Call Traces:
(...)
I obviously forgot to attach the files in the previous e-mail.
Hi there.
I just compiled a new 2.6.27-rc5 kernel for my standard Kurobox (an
embedded NAS that has an MPC8241 CPU, if I'm not mistaken) and upon
booting, I get these scary messages and Call Traces:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Linux version
The typesafe version of the powerpc pagetable handling (with
USE_STRICT_MM_TYPECHECKS defined) has bitrotted again. This patch
makes a bunch of small fixes to get it building again.
Signed-off-by: David Gibson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: working-2.6/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
27 matches
Mail list logo
