Re: DTS file PCI / i8259 for Xilinx ML510

2009-03-15 Thread Roderick Colenbrander
At some point in the file they create some (dummy?) pcie section in which they define a uli1575, an isa bus and attached to that isa bus a i8259. Is this the correct way of doing things? The i8259 driver seems to use io ports 0x20-21/0xa0-0xa1/0x4d0-0x4d1 those are also defined below

Re: DTS file PCI / i8259 for Xilinx ML510

2009-03-15 Thread Gerhard Pircher
Original-Nachricht Datum: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 09:38:26 +0100 Von: Roderick Colenbrander thunderbir...@gmx.net An: Gerhard Pircher gerhard_pirc...@gmx.net, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Betreff: Re: DTS file PCI / i8259 for Xilinx ML510 At some point in the file they create some

Re: DTS file PCI / i8259 for Xilinx ML510

2009-03-15 Thread Roderick Colenbrander
I got the i8259 south bridge working now after adding an io_base_virt offset to all inb/outb lines in sysdev/i8259.c. Would it be worth all the troubles to add ppc32 support to isa-bridge.c? The whole point of the code is basically to remap the io memory to low addresses for these 64-bit

[PATCH] powerpc: Remove extra semicolon in fsl_soc.c (2nd try)

2009-03-15 Thread Johns Daniel
TSEC/MDIO will not work with older device trees because of a semicolon at the end of a macro resulting in an empty for loop body. This fix only applies to 2.6.28; this code is gone in 2.6.29, according to Grant Likely! Signed-off-by: Johns Daniel johns.dan...@gmail.com

Re: DTS file PCI / i8259 for Xilinx ML510

2009-03-15 Thread Gerhard Pircher
Original-Nachricht Datum: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 12:00:17 +0100 Von: Roderick Colenbrander thunderbir...@gmx.net An: Gerhard Pircher gerhard_pirc...@gmx.net, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Betreff: Re: DTS file PCI / i8259 for Xilinx ML510 I got the i8259 south bridge working now

Re: use generic pci_assign_unassign_resources

2009-03-15 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 16:42 -0600, Mark Takatz wrote: Ben, We're looking at the fixes you put in place for the various PCI errors and we think this is the solution we need for our system, a GE Fanuc CM6 PPC board (single 8641), but your patches appear to apply either to 2.6.24 or 2.6.25,

Re: [RFC] Moving toward smarter disabling of FPRs, VRs, and VSRs in the MSR

2009-03-15 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 09:58 -0500, Ryan Arnold wrote: We can do some VMX testing on existing POWER6 machines. The VSX instruction set hasn't been fully implemented in GCC yet so we'll need to wait a bit for that. Does anyone have an idea for a good VMX/Altivec benchmark? Note that there

[PATCH] cpumask: use mm_cpumask() wrapper: powerpc

2009-03-15 Thread Rusty Russell
Makes code futureproof against the impending change to mm-cpu_vm_mask. It's also a chance to use the new cpumask_ ops which take a pointer (the older ones are deprecated, but there's no hurry for arch code). Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell ru...@rustcorp.com.au ---

Re: DTS device tree node for dual port RAM

2009-03-15 Thread Grant Likely
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:19 AM, EXTERNAL Lange Matthias (AA-DGW/ENG1) matthias.la...@beissbarth.com wrote: What hardware irq# are you using?  See this link for a description of what the interrupts property should look like for external IRQs: I am using hardware irq# 0 which is wired to the

Re: Freescale MPC8313ERDB-RevA and newer BSP/kernel

2009-03-15 Thread Vijay Nikam
Hi Mark, Could you please let me know how you booted the latest Linux kernel on MPC8313ERDB board ? ? ? As I tried but was not successful. It hangs or does nothing and waits at network configuration, mean to determine IP address (as I have used dhcp). Kindly please acknowledge ... thank you ...