Hi Josh,
There was a suggestion from Sergei, I incorporated and resubmitted.
Regards,
Rup
-Original Message-
From: Josh Boyer [mailto:jwbo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 12:18 AM
To: Rupjyoti Sarmah
Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
linuxppc
On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 01:39 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, Esben Haabendal wrote:
>
> NAK for various reasons (no particular order):
Ok. I can address 1 and 2, and I believe 3 is still under discussion, at
least as far as I am concerned.
> 1) That patch misses a sensible ch
On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 01:45 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> This patch has never been tested with spinlock debugging enabled and
> will break SMP as it causes a deadlock on irq_desc->lock.
>
> Again: See Documentation/Submit*
Ok, will do so.
But do you see the problem? In __setup_irq(), irq_ch
> -Original Message-
> From: kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:kvm-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Alexander Graf
> Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 10:08 PM
> To: Kevin Hao
> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti; Kumar Gala; Avi Kivity;
> k...@vger.kernel.org list; linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org; Liu Yu-B13
Hi Josh,
> I'd like to run a few tests with this disabled on the 4xx boards first please.
> I can't say that all the boards I have will have any sort of "distro" to begin
> with, and if they did they might not be running something from the last 3 or
> 4 years. I do run -git kernels on them frequ
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 11:29 -0600, John Linn wrote:
>> The code is not checking the interrupt for DMA correctly so that an
>> interrupt number of 0 will cause a false error.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Brian Hill
>> Signed-off-by: John Linn
>> And few more of these. Previous snapshot release
>> 2.6.35-rc1-git5(6c5de280b6...)
>> was good.
>
>That's very odd, since
>; git diff --stat 6c5de280b6..v2.6.35-rc2
> Makefile |2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |9 +++
> fs/ext4/inode.c
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, Esben Haabendal wrote:
What's the rationale of this patch and which problem does it solve ?
> Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal
> ---
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic.c |4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic.c b/arch
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, Esben Haabendal wrote:
NAK for various reasons (no particular order):
1) That patch misses a sensible changelog. See Documentation/Submit*
2) patch contains several independent changes, which need to be separated
> @@ -120,6 +124,10 @@ static int pca953x_gpio_direction_input
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 11:29 -0600, John Linn wrote:
> The code is not checking the interrupt for DMA correctly so that an
> interrupt number of 0 will cause a false error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Hill
> Signed-off-by: John Linn
> ---
> drivers/net/ll_temac_main.c |2 +-
> 1 files changed,
Dear Rupjyoti Sarmah,
In message <201006041226.o54cqh2v017...@amcc.com> you wrote:
> This patch enables the on-chip DWC SATA controller of the AppliedMicro
> processor 460EX.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rupjyoti Sarmah
> Signed-off-by: Mark Miesfeld
> Signed-off-by: Prodyut Hazarika
>
> ---
> drive
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 05:56:17PM +0530, Rupjyoti Sarmah wrote:
>This patch enables the on-chip DWC SATA controller of the AppliedMicro
>processor 460EX.
>
>Signed-off-by: Rupjyoti Sarmah
>Signed-off-by: Mark Miesfeld
>Signed-off-by: Prodyut Hazarika
What does the mean in the Subject?
>
>-
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 03:33:12PM +0530, Rupjyoti Sarmah wrote:
>
>Device tree update for the Applied micro processor 460ex on-chip SATA
>Signed-off-by: Rupjyoti Sarmah
You sent this same patch twice. Mistake, or was there supposed to be a
difference?
josh
_
On 06/04/2010 10:04 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 06/04/2010 06:24 AM, kerstin jonsson wrote:
Hi,
I'm using:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
and building for ARCH=powerpc - mpc85xx_defconfig
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c will not build due to a missing
MCS
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 08:36:54PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
> And few more of these. Previous snapshot release
> 2.6.35-rc1-git5(6c5de280b6...)
> was good.
That's very odd, since
; git diff --stat 6c5de280b6..v2.6.35-rc2
Makefile |2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/
While executing LTP Controller tests(memcg regression) on
a POWER6 box came across this following OOPS.
Memory cgroup out of memory: kill process 9139 (memcg_test_1) score 3 or a child
Killed process 9139 (memcg_test_1) vsz:3456kB, anon-rss:448kB, file-rss:1088kB
Memory cgroup out of memory: kill
16 matches
Mail list logo