Hi Ben,
On 07/27/2013 12:00 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 08:09 +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
>> *The lapic of a broadcast CPU is active always*. Say CPUX, wants the
>> broadcast CPU to wake it up at timeX. Since we cannot program the lapic
>> of a remote CPU, CPUX wil
Signed-off-by: Shaveta Leekha
---
.../devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/maple.txt | 50
1 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/maple.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/f
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 05:43:44PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 07/25/2013 07:54:53 AM, Kevin Hao wrote:
> >The reason is that the ppc kernel assume that the BARs starting
> >at 0 is unset and will reassign it later. There is a bug in the
> >previous
> >kernel, so the kernel maybe not work well fo
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:30:31 +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> > But why not put the initcall in drivers/of/fdt.c, that way it's not
> > early but it's still common ?
>
> Good idea! How does this look? So long as it happens before
> module_init(rand_initialize) we should be good
