Hi
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 7:16 PM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 11:31 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
>
>>
>> Btw., the original patch (wire up syscalls) can be applied unchanged.
>>
>
> Great! Can I use that as an Ack-by? I will send in the patch with
Hi
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 7:33 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
>>
>> Nice catch. We changed 'flags' from u64 to "unsigned int" in the last
>> revision of the series. Patch looks good,
Hi
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>
> On 08/31/2014 10:34 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
>> The only arch-dependent code for memfd_test.c is the syscall invocation:
>> memfd_create(const char *name, unsigned int flags);
>> via glibc as:
>>
Hi
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> Hi Geert,
>
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
>> Hi Pranith,
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>>> I see that the three syscalls seccomp, getrandom and memfd_create are not
>>> wir
