Olof Johansson wrote:
...
I disagree, I have one defconfig for all our boards to date. It means I
only have one kernel to build to test on all boards, instead of having
to build a number of different kernels. Keeping it fairly generic also
means a customer can start out using the generic
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Olof Johansson wrote:
...
I disagree, I have one defconfig for all our boards to date. It means I
only have one kernel to build to test on all boards, instead of having
to build a number of different kernels. Keeping it fairly generic also
means
On 1/23/08, Wolfgang Denk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Olof Johansson wrote:
...
I disagree, I have one defconfig for all our boards to date. It means I
only have one kernel to build to test on all boards, instead of having
to build a number of
On 1/17/08, Marian Balakowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Updates include:
- set soc node compatible property to fsl,mpc5200-immr
On these three boards; which have the original mpc5200 and which have
the mpc5200b?
I'm not going to pick up this patch immediately, I've got an invasive
set of
Grant Likely wrote:
On 1/17/08, Marian Balakowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Updates include:
- set soc node compatible property to fsl,mpc5200-immr
On these three boards; which have the original mpc5200 and which have
the mpc5200b?
cm5200 and motionpro have mpc5200b, some versions of
On 1/17/08, Marian Balakowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grant Likely wrote:
On 1/17/08, Marian Balakowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Updates include:
- set soc node compatible property to fsl,mpc5200-immr
On these three boards; which have the original mpc5200 and which have
the mpc5200b?
Grant Likely wrote:
On 1/17/08, Marian Balakowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grant Likely wrote:
On 1/17/08, Marian Balakowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Can you split the defconfig changes into a separate patch... That
being said, how do you feel about merging all the 5200 defconfigs into
