Re: [PATCH] sbc8548: fixup of PCI-e related DTS fields

2009-09-24 Thread Kumar Gala
On Sep 21, 2009, at 7:30 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: The PCI-e addressing was originally patterned of the MPC8548CDS which has PCI1, PCI2, and PCI-e. Since this board only has PCI1 and PCI-e, it makes more sense to be similar to the MPC8568MDS board. This does that by cutting the PCI/PCI-e I/O

[PATCH] sbc8548: fixup of PCI-e related DTS fields

2009-09-21 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The PCI-e addressing was originally patterned of the MPC8548CDS which has PCI1, PCI2, and PCI-e. Since this board only has PCI1 and PCI-e, it makes more sense to be similar to the MPC8568MDS board. This does that by cutting the PCI/PCI-e I/O sizes from 16MB to 8MB and pulling the PCI-e I/O range

Re: [PATCH] sbc8548: fixup of PCI-e related DTS fields

2009-09-21 Thread Segher Boessenkool
- 0x0 0x0800>; + 0x0 0x080>; You might want to write that as 0x0080, otherwise people will think it says 128M still :-) Segher ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lis

[PATCH] sbc8548: fixup of PCI-e related DTS fields

2009-09-20 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The PCI-e addressing was originally patterned of the MPC8548CDS which has PCI1, PCI2, and PCI-e. Since this board only has PCI1 and PCI-e, it makes more sense to be similar to the MPC8568MDS board. This does that by cutting the PCI/PCI-e I/O sizes from 16MB to 8MB and pulling the PCI-e I/O range