On Aug 9, 2011, at 3:59 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
I guess my poor wording may have gotten me in trouble. I am getting
ready to repost this patch, but I want to ensure I am getting it as
right as possible.
I think I should reword the commit message to indicate we are removing
the
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:52:07AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 9, 2011, at 3:59 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
I guess my poor wording may have gotten me in trouble. I am getting
ready to repost this patch, but I want to ensure I am getting it as
right as possible.
I think I should
In working with the socketcan developers, we have come to the conclusion
the fsl-flexcan device tree bindings need to be cleaned up. The driver
does not depend upon any properties other than the required properties
so we are removing the file. Additionally, the p1010*dts files are not
following
On 08/09/2011 09:43 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
In working with the socketcan developers, we have come to the conclusion
the fsl-flexcan device tree bindings need to be cleaned up.
The driver does not depend upon any properties other than the required
properties
so we are removing the file.
That
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 01:17:47PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On 08/09/2011 09:43 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
In working with the socketcan developers, we have come to the conclusion
the fsl-flexcan device tree bindings need to be cleaned up.
The driver does not depend upon any properties other
On 08/09/2011 01:45 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 01:17:47PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On 08/09/2011 09:43 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
In working with the socketcan developers, we have come to the conclusion
the fsl-flexcan device tree bindings need to be cleaned up.
The driver does
On 08/09/2011 08:17 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 08/09/2011 09:43 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
In working with the socketcan developers, we have come to the conclusion
the fsl-flexcan device tree bindings need to be cleaned up.
The driver does not depend upon any properties other than the required
On 08/09/2011 09:13 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 08/09/2011 01:45 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 01:17:47PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On 08/09/2011 09:43 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
In working with the socketcan developers, we have come to the conclusion
the fsl-flexcan device tree
On 08/09/2011 02:49 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Yes. The doc for the bindings we speak about
http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.0.1/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fsl-flexcan.txt
sneaked into the kernel without been presented on any mailing list and
without the corresponding
On 08/09/2011 02:32 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
On 08/09/2011 08:17 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 08/09/2011 09:43 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
In working with the socketcan developers, we have come to the conclusion
the fsl-flexcan device tree bindings need to be cleaned up.
The driver does not
I guess my poor wording may have gotten me in trouble. I am getting
ready to repost this patch, but I want to ensure I am getting it as
right as possible.
I think I should reword the commit message to indicate we are removing
the Documentation/.../fsl-flexcan.txt file which has essentially
11 matches
Mail list logo
