.
After I've copied new drivers/mtd/nand/nand_ecc,c to 2.6.26, the delay
disappeared.
Felix.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Long-boot-delay-on-460EX-with-2.6.28-rc8-tp21070179p21156958.html
Sent from the linuxppc-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Felix,
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Felix Radensky wrote:
>
> I've found the cause of the delay. It was a stupid error on my part, not
> related to ndfc driver, which is fine. Thanks a lot for you work on this.
>
Could you share the error?* (I'm sure I can easily exceed your level
of stupidit
e u-boot and the ndfc driver.
>
> Cheers,
>Sean
>
>
Thanks, Sean
I've found the cause of the delay. It was a stupid error on my part, not
related to ndfc driver, which is fine. Thanks a lot for you work on this.
I apologize for the noise.
Felix.
--
View this message in
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 23:23:58 +0200
"Felix Radensky" wrote:
> Hi, Sean
>
> Do you have any ideas what can cause such delay ?
Sorry, I haven't been following this thread :(
We also use a 256M NAND, although a Spansion S29GL. While there is a
small delay in u-boot, there is no noticeable during t
Stefan Roese wrote:
On Friday 19 December 2008, Felix Radensky wrote:
Thanks a lot to everyone who replied. I've managed to identify the cause
of the delay. The board is equipped with 256 MiB Samsung NAND flash.
Since NAND support is a must for this platform, I've intergated the ndfc
driver r
printf("Unable to update property NOR mapping, err=%s\n",
fdt_strerror(rc));
}
}
Felix.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Long-boot-delay-on-460EX-with-2.6.28-rc8-tp21070179p21087541.html
Sent from the linuxppc-dev
printf("Unable to update property NOR mapping, err=%s\n",
fdt_strerror(rc));
}
}
Felix.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Long-boot-delay-on-460EX-with-2.6.28-rc8-tp21070179p21087540.html
Sent from the linuxppc-dev
On Friday 19 December 2008, Felix Radensky wrote:
> Thanks a lot to everyone who replied. I've managed to identify the cause
> of the delay. The board is equipped with 256 MiB Samsung NAND flash.
> Since NAND support is a must for this platform, I've intergated the ndfc
> driver recently posted by
AND flash
takes around 20 seconds. The ndfc driver works fine after boot.
Felix.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Long-boot-delay-on-460EX-with-2.6.28-rc8-tp21070179p21087072.html
Sent from the linuxppc-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_
On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 22:01 +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:51:29PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> I saw somewhat similar behaviour on 83xx target, the cause was
> >> that my .config file contained bogus UDBG_RTAS_CONSOLE=y symbol
> >> (or was it PPC_EARLY_DEBUG_RTAS_PANE
Dear Felix Radensky,
In message <21070179.p...@talk.nabble.com> you wrote:
>
> I'm experiencing a long (around 20 sec) delay from the moment
> u-boot-1.3.4 passes control to linux and until the first kernel message
> appears on console. This happens on custom board, I don't have access
> to Canyo
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 02:29:52AM -0800, Felix Radensky wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>I'm experiencing a long (around 20 sec) delay from the moment
>u-boot-1.3.4 passes control to linux and until the first kernel message
>appears on console. This happens on custom board, I don't have access
>to Canyonlands to
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 12:51:29PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Dec 18, 2008, at 10:02 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 02:29:52AM -0800, Felix Radensky wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm experiencing a long (around 20 sec) delay from the moment
>>> u-boot-1.3.4 passes control
On Dec 18, 2008, at 10:02 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 02:29:52AM -0800, Felix Radensky wrote:
Hi,
I'm experiencing a long (around 20 sec) delay from the moment
u-boot-1.3.4 passes control to linux and until the first kernel
message
appears on console.
I saw somewh
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 02:29:52AM -0800, Felix Radensky wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm experiencing a long (around 20 sec) delay from the moment
> u-boot-1.3.4 passes control to linux and until the first kernel message
> appears on console.
I saw somewhat similar behaviour on 83xx target, the cause was
de to make it boot on custom board, just removed PCIX and PCIE0 nodes
from DTS.
Has anyone experienced similar behavior with 460EX ? Any hints what can
cause this ?
Thanks a lot.
Felix.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Long-boot-delay-on-460EX-with-2.6.28-rc8-tp2107017
16 matches
Mail list logo
