On 5/7/08, Sascha Hauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 11:53:49AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 12:27 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > memcpy_from/to_io() use word aligned accesses on the io side of memory.
> > > The MPC5200 local plus bus where ou
Hi,
>>> memcpy_from/to_io() use word aligned accesses on the io side of
>>> memory.
>>> The MPC5200 local plus bus where our flashes are connected does not
>>> allow unaligned accesses, so we have to use the io versions of memcpy.
>>
>> But this region of flash is marked as suitable for execute-in
memcpy_from/to_io() use word aligned accesses on the io side of
memory.
The MPC5200 local plus bus where our flashes are connected does not
allow unaligned accesses, so we have to use the io versions of memcpy.
But this region of flash is marked as suitable for execute-in-place,
otherwise the p
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 11:53:49AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 12:27 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > memcpy_from/to_io() use word aligned accesses on the io side of memory.
> > The MPC5200 local plus bus where our flashes are connected does not
> > allow unaligned accesses,
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 12:27 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> memcpy_from/to_io() use word aligned accesses on the io side of memory.
> The MPC5200 local plus bus where our flashes are connected does not
> allow unaligned accesses, so we have to use the io versions of memcpy.
But this region of flash i
