On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 22:24 +0800, Wang Jian wrote:
>
> I had this patch and 2 fixes on dts applied simultaneously, and the
> board
> works. I thought this patch was necessary.
>
> I reverted this patch and tried again, the board still works. Thanks
> for
> your insight.
>
> Anyway, the io port
Confirmed.
I had this patch and 2 fixes on dts applied simultaneously, and the board
works. I thought this patch was necessary.
I reverted this patch and tried again, the board still works. Thanks for
your insight.
Anyway, the io port read from /proc/ioports is misleading, so I wish it
can be c
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 09:19 +0800, Wang Jian wrote:
> The following patch works fine.
And will break platforms that explicitely want IO port 0 to be on the
primary bus, though I'm not sure there's many of these left...
Ben.
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> b/arch/powerpc/kernel
On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 19:16 +0800, Wang Jian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here I have a 8541 dev board, with 2 e1000 attached to pci0 and a
> homebrewed addon board inserted into pci1. I am trying to make it work
> under 2.6.26-rc8 (2.6.26 broken so I am working at rc8).
>
> The ioports allocation reads
>
>
The following patch works fine.
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
index 063cdd4..4b913e0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
@@ -582,9 +582,19 @@ void __devinit pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges(struct
pci_
Hi,
Here I have a 8541 dev board, with 2 e1000 attached to pci0 and a
homebrewed addon board inserted into pci1. I am trying to make it work
under 2.6.26-rc8 (2.6.26 broken so I am working at rc8).
The ioports allocation reads
$ cat /proc/ioports
-000f : /[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1000
