On 01/22/2015 10:59 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 14:40 +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
On 01/16/2015 02:26 PM, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
On 01/16/2015 08:34 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 13:28 +1300, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 01/16/2015 02:22 AM,
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 14:40 +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
On 01/16/2015 02:26 PM, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
On 01/16/2015 08:34 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 13:28 +1300, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 01/16/2015 02:22 AM, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
Hi Alexey,
Can you let
On 01/17/2015 07:09 PM, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
On 01/16/2015 08:34 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 13:28 +1300, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 01/16/2015 02:22 AM, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
Hi Alexey,
Can you let me know if the following patch fixes the issue for you ?
It did
On 01/16/2015 08:34 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 13:28 +1300, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 01/16/2015 02:22 AM, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
Hi Alexey,
Can you let me know if the following patch fixes the issue for you ?
It did for us on one of our machines that we were
On 01/16/2015 08:34 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 13:28 +1300, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 01/16/2015 02:22 AM, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
Hi Alexey,
Can you let me know if the following patch fixes the issue for you ?
It did for us on one of our machines that we were
On 01/16/2015 02:26 PM, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
On 01/16/2015 08:34 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 13:28 +1300, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 01/16/2015 02:22 AM, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
Hi Alexey,
Can you let me know if the following patch fixes the issue for you ?
It did
the following
patch to
handle it right.
[1]http://linuxppc.10917.n7.nabble.com/offlining-cpus-breakage-td88619.html
There is no issue in programming the decrementer as was presumed and stated in
this link.
Signed-off-by: Preeti U Murthy pre...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
kernel/time
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 13:28 +1300, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 01/16/2015 02:22 AM, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
Hi Alexey,
Can you let me know if the following patch fixes the issue for you ?
It did for us on one of our machines that we were investigating on.
This fixes the issue for me
operation. If this logic fails to
move the broadcast hrtimer due to a race condition we have the following patch
to
handle it right.
[1]http://linuxppc.10917.n7.nabble.com/offlining-cpus-breakage-td88619.html
There is no issue in programming the decrementer as was presumed and stated in
this link
On Wednesday 07 January 2015 03:07 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
Hi!
ppc64_cpu --smt=off produces multiple error on the latest upstream kernel
(sha1 bdec419):
NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#20 stuck for 23s! [swapper/20:0]
or
INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: {
Hi,
On Wednesday 07 January 2015 03:07 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
Hi!
ppc64_cpu --smt=off produces multiple error on the latest upstream kernel
(sha1 bdec419):
NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#20 stuck for 23s! [swapper/20:0]
or
INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on
Hi!
ppc64_cpu --smt=off produces multiple error on the latest upstream kernel
(sha1 bdec419):
NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#20 stuck for 23s! [swapper/20:0]
or
INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: { 2 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2
4 25 26 27 28 29 30 31}
12 matches
Mail list logo