On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 04:04:56PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 03:12:53PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> >>Hi Gautham,
> >>
> >>Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
> >>>From: "Gautham R. Shenoy"
> >>>
> >>>+
> >>>+static inline u64
Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 03:12:53PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
Hi Gautham,
Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
>From: "Gautham R. Shenoy"
>
>+
>+static inline u64 read_this_idle_purr(void)
>+{
>+ /*
>+* If we are reading from an idle context, update the
>+* idle-purr
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 03:12:53PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> Hi Gautham,
>
> Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
> >From: "Gautham R. Shenoy"
> >
> >Currently when CPU goes idle, we take a snapshot of PURR via
> >pseries_idle_prolog() which is used at the CPU idle exit to compute
> >the idle PURR
Hi Gautham,
Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
From: "Gautham R. Shenoy"
Currently when CPU goes idle, we take a snapshot of PURR via
pseries_idle_prolog() which is used at the CPU idle exit to compute
the idle PURR cycles via the function pseries_idle_epilog(). Thus,
the value of idle PURR cycle thus
From: "Gautham R. Shenoy"
Currently when CPU goes idle, we take a snapshot of PURR via
pseries_idle_prolog() which is used at the CPU idle exit to compute
the idle PURR cycles via the function pseries_idle_epilog(). Thus,
the value of idle PURR cycle thus read before pseries_idle_prolog() and
