hi,
I m using Montavista linux kernel 2.6.10, boot-loader is u-boot-1.1.2 and
flash is MBM29LV160T(Fujitsu MBM29LV160T).
After nfs mounting, jffs2 mounting is done with empty partition.
But after jffs2 mounting kernel hangs...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# mount -t jffs2 /dev/mtdblock0 /mnt
[EMAIL
Hello,
Martin, Tim wrote:
Could you tell me where exactly to get the "xuartlite_serial.c"
?
I could not find "xuartlite_serial.c" in the drivers folder
generated by EDK .
(\ppc405_0\libsrc\linux_mvl31_v1_01_b\linux\drivers\char\xilinx_uartlite
)
Here's the relevant snippet for xu
On 11/03/07 01:55 +0100, Matthias Fechner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Matthias Fechner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-03-07 00:42]:
> > It seems now that everything works fine. I will check it for the next
> > days. And will give some feedback.
>
> ok, I checked now the driver some time at it failed. So it seems
Hi!
Some fixes, improvements from last time:
- saving/restoring of some registers inside sleep code
(so bestcomm and pic patches can be dropped, yay)
- improvements in FEC code for deep-sleep
- set up wakeup GPIO so Efika can wake too
- patch against latest u-boot (doh)
Patches are based on la
MPC52xx uart power management.
Not sure how exactly this should be written, but this seems
to work, and works around a few seconds delay in resume.
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: grant.git/drivers/serial/mpc52xx_uart.c
=
Suspend and resume for FEC on MPC52xx.
Note that resume is a bit different for lite5200b low-power mode.
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/net/fec_mpc52xx/fec.c | 60 --
drivers/net/fec_mpc52xx/fec_phy.c | 17 ++
dri
Trivial suspend and resume OF OHCI.
On MPC52xx turn off and on power to ports.
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: grant.git/drivers/usb/host/ohci-ppc-of.c
===
--- grant.git.orig/drivers/usb/host/ohci-ppc-of.c
+++
Implement deep-sleep on MPC52xx.
SDRAM is put into self-refresh with help of SRAM code
(alternatives would be code in FLASH, I-cache).
Interrupt code must also not be in SDRAM, so put it
in I-cache.
MPC52xx core is static, so contents will remain intact even
with clocks turned off.
Signed-off-by:
U-Boot part of Lite5200b low power mode support.
Puts SDRAM out of self-refresh and transfers control to
address saved at physical 0x0.
---
board/icecube/icecube.c | 50
1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)
Index: u-boot.git/board/icecube/icecube.c
Low-power mode implementation for Lite5200b.
Some I/O registers are also saved here.
A patch to U-Boot that wakes up SDRAM, and transfers control
to address saved at physical 0x0 is needed.
Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/Makefile |3
On 3/15/07, Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Trivial suspend and resume OF OHCI.
> On MPC52xx turn off and on power to ports.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Nak; see below
>
> Index: grant.git/drivers/usb/host/ohci-ppc-of.c
> ===
On 3/15/07, Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Suspend and resume for FEC on MPC52xx.
>
> Note that resume is a bit different for lite5200b low-power mode.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This of course cannot be applied until a mpc5200 ethernet driver is
actually in m
Hi:
I'm trying to bring up Linux on Xilinx ML403 reference board.
I took 2.6.19.2 kernel from DENX. EDK project for ML403 I took from
official Xilinx site.
I could bring up u-boot on the board, everything is working fine (see
ml403.h file attached). Then I compiled uImage for kernel and tried to
On 3/15/07, Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Low-power mode implementation for Lite5200b.
> Some I/O registers are also saved here.
>
> A patch to U-Boot that wakes up SDRAM, and transfers control
> to address saved at physical 0x0 is needed.
I don't see any structural problems with this
I have a PPC8241 which does an
Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 4 [#1]
PREEMPT
NIP: 0900 LR: C00E579C CTR: 3A55
When doing a 'tar -xvzf'. The NIP is pointing at the decrementer
interrupt, I believe.
As I understand the decrementer, this is basically the timer tick in the
ppc and goe
Hello.
Charles Krinke wrote:
> I have a PPC8241 which does an
> Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 4 [#1]
> PREEMPT
> NIP: 0900 LR: C00E579C CTR: 3A55
> When doing a 'tar -xvzf'. The NIP is pointing at the decrementer
> interrupt, I believe.
> As I understand the decrementer, this i
On 15/03/07 08:09 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On 3/15/07, Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Low-power mode implementation for Lite5200b.
> >Some I/O registers are also saved here.
> >
> >A patch to U-Boot that wakes up SDRAM, and transfers control
> >to address saved at physical 0x0 is ne
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 16:42, Benedict, Michael wrote:
> dtc- development snapshot "dtc-20060419.tar.gz" and recent git
> sources
> U-boot - 1.2.0, git sources from denx.de, and git sources from freescale
> Kernel - 2.6.20.1, 2.6.20.2, and freescale git sources
Do yourself a favor and get an u
Obviously, you've got an exception in the decrementer exception
handler
itself -- and this was something like program check exception, judging
on the
signal you've got (SIGILL).
> So, with that said:
> "What might be the causes of such an exception from the decrementer in
a
> 2.6.17.11 ppc
Hello.
Charles Krinke wrote:
> Obviously, you've got an exception in the decrementer exception
> handler
> itself -- and this was something like program check exception, judging
> on the
> signal you've got (SIGILL).
>>So, with that said:
>>"What might be the causes of such an exception f
> mtspr SPRN_SPRG0, r10
> mtspr SPRN_SPRG1, r11
> Which is, I believe, moving r10 to SPRG0 and r11 to SPRG1.
> So, how do we know that r10 and r11 are always valid in an interrupt
> context? Are we setting aside r10 and r11 somewhere else in
That doesn't matter to kernel at all -- they are
On Mar 15, 2007, at 1:55 PM, Charles Krinke wrote:
>
>> mtspr SPRN_SPRG0, r10
>> mtspr SPRN_SPRG1, r11
>
>> Which is, I believe, moving r10 to SPRG0 and r11 to SPRG1.
>
>> So, how do we know that r10 and r11 are always valid in an interrupt
>> context? Are we setting aside r10 and r11 somewhere e
Can you post the oops that you are seeing, what you need to find out
is what instruction image that is causing the illegal instruction
exception. Once you have that it will be easier to figure out what's
going on.
- k
Dear Kumar:
Here is the Oops, and thank you for looking at this. Thi
I ran a couple of more tests and the system did not Oops in the
timer_interupt except for the first test this morning. The last two
times, the NIP was
Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 4 [#1]
PREEMPT
NIP: C002CE68 LR: C002CEC8 CTR: 3B25
REGS: c3119a00 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (2.6.17.11)
Anyone knows which device is used to generate the system tick on 8xx processor?
Bye,
Antonio.
___
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> Anyone knows which device is used to generate the system tick on 8xx
> processor?
DEC
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, HRB 165235 Munich, CEO: Wolfgang Denk
Office: Kirchenstr. 5, D-82194 Groebenzell,
Hi:
Does anybody use u-boot+linux on ML403 board? If yes, can somebody give
me kernel or kernel patch to any open source kernel tree (DENX or
kernel.org).
I couldn't prepare uImage which is working with u-boot on ML403 board -
it hangs forever:
TFTP from server 192.168.0.141; our IP address is 1
On Mar 15, 2007, at 4:17 PM, Charles Krinke wrote:
> I ran a couple of more tests and the system did not Oops in the
> timer_interupt except for the first test this morning. The last two
> times, the NIP was
>
> Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 4 [#1]
> PREEMPT
> NIP: C002CE68 LR: C002CEC8 CT
Hello Domen,
* Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [15-03-07 10:57]:
> Can you please try following patch.
ok, I patched the kernel now and was able to read the ic2 chip 100
times successfully. I will run the programm the next 20 hours and give
then a shot feedback.
But the first impression is good.
hi all,
I am a fresh guy here, this is my first time sending mails, thanks to all in
advance.
I got MontaVista Linux run on Xilinx ML403(Powerpc 405, Virtex-4).
after that,
I am going to input/output sound upon MontaVista Linux, but I found that
default kernel seems no support for audio.
can
30 matches
Mail list logo