Re: DS1337 RTC on I2C broken.

2007-11-29 Thread Alessandro Zummo
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:03:49 +0100 Clemens Koller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> My guess is that the new rtc-lib's RTC_DRV_DS1307 support is still broken > >> and it also breaks the deprecated SENSORS_DS1337. :-( > > One more update: > I am back to mainline (linus' .git) on 2.6.24-rc3-g09f345da

Re: DS1337 RTC on I2C broken.

2007-11-29 Thread Clemens Koller
Hi There! > Clemens Koller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Well, as already mentioned, I have problems to get my DS1337 RTC on I2C >> on my MPC8540(ads like) PowerPC working properly on >> latest 2.6.24-rc2-ge6a5c27f kernels. A paulus.git 2.6.21-rc5-g9a5ee4cc >> as well as a 2.6.22-rc6-gb75ae860 is

RE: The question about the high memory support on MPC8360?

2007-11-29 Thread Rune Torgersen
> From: robert lazarski > Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 7:00 AM > Subject: Re: The question about the high memory support on MPC8360? > I also have a requirement to use more than 768MB and 0x3000. I > have other problems at the moment, so I haven't tested this completely > yet. My limited u

Re: The question about the high memory support on MPC8360?

2007-11-29 Thread Dale Farnsworth
Robert lazarski wrote: > On Nov 29, 2007 2:29 AM, vijay baskar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > How to make the linux find the total 2GB memory? > > > > Hi Friend, > > > > I hope u had tracked the conversion that has been going on. The max mem > > that the kernel can show is only 768 MB

Re: The question about the high memory support on MPC8360?

2007-11-29 Thread robert lazarski
On Nov 29, 2007 2:29 AM, vijay baskar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How to make the linux find the total 2GB memory? > > > Hi Friend, > > I hope u had tracked the conversion that has been going on. The max mem > that the kernel can show is only 768 MB because only that of memory is > dir

Re: Init hangs on Xilinx4

2007-11-29 Thread schardt
David H. Lynch Jr. wrote: > I had a similar problem. In my instance it turned out that I was > inadvertently using the physical address of my uart as the output address. > This worked during boot becasue there was a 1:1 physical-logical entry > stuffed into the MMU. But since Linux did nto know ab

Re: DS1337 RTC on I2C broken.

2007-11-29 Thread Clemens Koller
Hello, Raul! [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > I am trying to use some devices on i2c protocol, one of them is the DS1337 > RTC, but I don't know too much about how. > I am using the Linux kernel 2.6.15 and a mpc866 processor. I don't remember too much about these old kernels. And, please notice, t

Re: Init hangs on Xilinx4

2007-11-29 Thread David H. Lynch Jr.
I had a similar problem. In my instance it turned out that I was inadvertently using the physical address of my uart as the output address. This worked during boot becasue there was a 1:1 physical-logical entry stuffed into the MMU. But since Linux did nto know about it, as soon as the VM system de

Re: DS1337 RTC on I2C broken.

2007-11-29 Thread raul . moreno
Hello all, I am trying to use some devices on i2c protocol, one of them is the DS1337 RTC, but I don't know too much about how. I am using the Linux kernel 2.6.15 and a mpc866 processor. I've seen there is a cpm i2c interface for these processors (for a rpx board). However the corresponding code (

Re: DS1337 RTC on I2C broken.

2007-11-29 Thread Clemens Koller
Hello, Allessandro! Alessandro Zummo schrieb: > On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 19:25:00 +0100 > Clemens Koller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Well, as already mentioned, I have problems to get my DS1337 RTC on I2C >> on my MPC8540(ads like) PowerPC working properly on >> latest 2.6.24-rc2-ge6a5c27f ke

Re: Xilinx devicetrees

2007-11-29 Thread David H. Lynch Jr.
John Williams wrote: > > I'm not sure I agree, here, given that most people building MicroBlaze > systems are doing so with uClinux-dist (or PetaLinux), you can do a > full rebuilt, kernel libs apps, in a couple of minutes. Much shorter > than sythnesis and P&R, that's for sure (and runtime is line

Re: Unable to Read PPC440EPx Board ID thru Board Control and Status Registers (BCSR)

2007-11-29 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Dell (???), On Thursday 29 November 2007, Dell Query wrote: > 1. I used the 0x1c0002000 offset because I was referring to the first reply > that I received. Now, I used the address 0x1c0002000 and tried to read from > it. I retrieved 0x0f01c087. May I know what does this mean? How does this > d

Re: Unable to Read PPC440EPx Board ID thru Board Control and Status Registers (BCSR)

2007-11-29 Thread Dell Query
Hi Stefan, 1. I used the 0x1c0002000 offset because I was referring to the first reply that I received. Now, I used the address 0x1c0002000 and tried to read from it. I retrieved 0x0f01c087. May I know what does this mean? How does this data relate to Board ID? 2. Referring back to "Embedded P