Hi,
JYFI, The following URL which provided my Linux patches for the
ML403/404 boards:
http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/rtslab/demos/amos/xupv2pro/
has been changed to
http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/rtslab/demos/xupv2pro/
cheers,
-Ameet
___
Linuxppc-embedded mail
"-static" option tells gcc to generate an executable that will run by itself.
All the runtime libraries (eg. glibc) are linked into the application code to
form one big executable.
-Ameet
patel nirav wrote:
> Hello all,
> Can any body tell me what is the use of " - static" option for gcc
> co
Hi Junita,
Its a hack really! When I was developing/porting the SysAce driver
to 2.6 I tried to maintain the code as is from the 2.4 kernel driver. In
doing so I found that there is a slight difference between the two
kernels. i.e. I am not sure why, but the sysace device can only handle
re
Hi Neil,
Please help yourself! Everything in
http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/rtslab/demos/amos/xupv2pro/ is for public
access! And yes! You are right...
http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/rtslab/demos/amos/ is not for public.
Do post your comments or bugs (if any) on the linux embedded ppc mailing
list (lin
Pradeep,
What you have pasted is only part of the messages displayed. I can't
tell anything from this apart from you 'root=' option. It would be nice
if you could paste the entire log of the boot messages right from
'loaded at: xxx ' to 'Kernel Rebooting in 150 seconds'.
-Ameet
> that the driver for TEMAC only support Gigabit Enet, not 10/100/1000M
> adapted. But because I want to use the Gigabit enet, I don't care
> that. So
> it's OK, at lease for 1Gbit/s.
>
> So I don't think Pradeep's problem is caused by Temac.
Ming Liu wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> [ 3.093694] TCP bic registered
>> [ 3.129458] NET: Registered protocol family 8
>> [ 3.181412] NET: Registered protocol family 20
>> [ 3.236744] VFS: Cannot open root device "xsa2" or unknown-block(0,0)
>> [ 3.313092] Please append a correct "root=" boot option
>
> It loo
Pradeep Sampath wrote:
> Hi Ameet,
> Thanks for the instant reply. I changed root parameter to xsa as you
> suggested root=/dev/xsa2. But i still get the same failure.
>
> [3.093694] TCP bic registered
> [3.129458] NET: Registered protocol family 8
> [3.181412] NET: Registered protoc
Hi Pradeep,
Pradeep Sampath wrote:
> Hello Ameet/Ming!
>
> I am running linux kernel 2.6 on a ML403. Your posts on the list was
> extremely helpful and saved a lot of time. But i have ran into a
> number of issues and need your help. I have described both the scenarios.
>
> Problem 1:
> I fo
size of
> the sysace buffers, how many interrupts do you get per sector read? Do
> you see extras or not enough?
>
> I heard from Ameet Patil that this driver is not tested in
> poilling mode and it failed when we tried also.
> Thats when we moved to interrupt
alayrac wrote:
> Hi Ameet,
>
> Thanks for your reply
>
>> you got the URL wrong. Its http://linux.get2knowmore.com
>>
> I've got the right address but I've made an error in the email.
>
> Following your instrcutions I've succeed to run the 2.6.17.1 kernel on
> my ML403 board. The process st
alayrac wrote:
> I'm new member of this mailing list an I'm looking for some information
> on UBOOT on ML403.
>
> stevea-mdi talk about a pacth from Ameet
> (http://www.linux2knowmore.com) but I did not succeed to find this
> pacth.
>
you got the URL wrong. Its http://linux.get2knowmore.com
c
agnel juni wrote:
> Hi Ameet
>
> I have posted a few messages regarding Ssytem ACE driver for Linux-2.6.
>
> We are working on a AMCC 440SPe based custom board.
>
> We applied the patch from
> //http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/rtslab/demos/amos/xupv2pro/patches/linuxppc-2.6.17.1-sysace-1.2.patch
> //and
Hi Sudheer,
Ah! I never did the test for polled mode. There might be issue with
that. Will have a look
-Ameet
sudheer wrote:
> Hi Ameet Patil
>
> Ameet Patil wrote:
>> Hi Sudheer,
>>Frank has already answered your questions. If you have any problems
>>
Hi Sudheer,
Ah! I never did the test for polled mode. There might be issue with
that. Will have a look
-Ameet
sudheer wrote:
> Hi Ameet Patil
>
> Ameet Patil wrote:
>> Hi Sudheer,
>>Frank has already answered your questions. If you have any problems
>>
image of linux for powerpc on this board?
>
>
> pls reply as im right now bowled out .
>
> Thanks,
> Ujwal
>
>
>
>
> On 8/11/06, *Ameet Patil* < ammubhai at gmail.com
> <mailto:ammubhai at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Ujwal,
&g
Ujwal,
Have a look at:
http://splish.ee.byu.edu/projects/LinuxFPGA/configuring.htm
http://www.crhc.uiuc.edu/IMPACT/gsrc/hardwarelab/docs/kernel-HOWTO.html
http://linux.get2knowmore.com/
U might get some idea.
-Ameet
Ujwal wrote:
>
>
> hi all,
>
> im new to porting of Linux to PowerPC . Coul
Hi Sudheer,
Frank has already answered your questions. If you have any problems
with the SysAce patch... do let me know. I have written a small tutorial
here if it helps...
http://linux.get2knowmore.com
-Ameet
sudheer wrote:
> Hello Ameet Patil
>
> I am looking for linux kern
Hi Benjamin,
I had ported the ENET driver but it was a bit buggy. Could you send
me your driver patch so I can test it?
Thanks,
-Ameet
Benjamin Heyne wrote:
> Hi all,
> despite having problems with zlib, I'd like to know which
> device drivers for the XUPV2P have already been ported
> to the
appen to get an Ethernet mac going on the virtex2 or
> virtex4 with the 2.6 kernel?
>
> Ed
>
> Ameet Patil wrote:
>
>> Thanks Ed! I did get a root fs up and running NOT using JFFS2 though.
>> I used ext2.
>>
>> cheers,
>> -Ameet
>>
>&g
Try this if it helps!
http://www.linux.get2knowmore.com/
-Ameet
Benjamin Heyne wrote:
> Dear all,
> I am currently trying to get the 2.6.17.1 Linux kernel
> running on the Xilinx Virtex. I have the 2.4 kernel up
> and running - No problems there...
>
> But when using the 2.6 kernel (have copied
Thanks Ed! I did get a root fs up and running NOT using JFFS2 though. I
used ext2.
cheers,
-Ameet
Edward Bockhoefer wrote:
> I found your post about the Virtex II part one at
> http://www.linux.get2knowmore.com. Thanks for the info. Did you happen
> to get a root fs up and running using jffs2?
Hi Raja,
Did you update the xparameters_ml300.h or xparameters_ml403.h file
with the right defines for your specific board? If not, then you need to
update the file first. This first is automatically generated by the EDK
toolset. However, you might also choose to do it manually if you know
Hi Raja,
I have ported the Xilinx System ACE driver to 2.6 kernel. Find the
latest one here:
http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/rtslab/demos/amos/xupv2pro/patches/linuxppc-2.6.17.1-sysace-1.2.patch
NOTE: this patch wouldn't work if you are using the TEMAC driver. In
which case use the -after-TEMAC pat
Hi Ming,
I know this might be very tedious for you. But its the same for me
especially when there is no need for me to do it. Anyway, could please
do a fresh start: untar linux kernel, apply all the TEMAC patches and
then apply my only 1 xx-after-TEMAC.patch
I have updated the patch. Make sure
g operation, please forgive me because I am a novice. That's
> why I would like to describe the procedure as detailed as possible.
I appreciate you testing the patch. Don't worry... we will solve it. And
I am not an expert either... you probably know more than me!
-Ameet
>
> .config. The linux version is 2.6.17.1. When you compile the kernel,
> please remember to export C_INCLUDE_PATH=../driver/xilinx_edk.
> Thanks for your work.
>
> Regards
> Ming
>
>
>> From: Ameet Patil
>> To: Ming Liu
>> CC: linuxppc-embed
Hi Ming,
Can you send me the entire text output (in a file) of the compilation
process with errors?
-Ameet
Ming Liu wrote:
> Dear Ameet,
>
>> 1. Which TEMAC patch are you using?
>> (http://source.mvista.com/~ank/paulus-powerpc/20060309/ppc32_xilinx_edk_temac.patch)
>>
>>
>
> There are five
definition of
> `XNullHandler'
> drivers/block/built-in.o(.text+0x38dc):drivers/block/xilinx_sysace/xbasic_types.
>
>
>
> c:136: first defined here
> make[1]: *** [drivers/built-in.o] Error 1
> make: *** [drivers] Error 2
>
> This time I only tried on linu
hoose Temac. ) So let's find out the problem together.
> Also, I don't know if this is a problem from SystemACE or Temac , I
> would like to invite Andrei to look at this altogether. If any
> suggestion, please feel free to announce. Thanks for both your help.
> Regards
> Ming
Hi Ming,
> I heard that you have tested this driver. Have you got this problem?
> Why there are so many strange problems for me while you have tested
> without problem?
Yes, that is right! When I say... I have tested - "it really means I
have tested". So what's the problem? It works for me but no
Hi Ming,
Check if the kernel boot options are set right? (ie.
console=ttyS0,9600 root=/dev/xsa3). Sometimes the configuration is lost.
If this is intact, then another thing to try is to start from the
beginning: make mrproper and then make menuconfig, etc.
I have not looked into TEMAC patch yet
Its the same link as before! I just updated the file!
http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/rtslab/demos/amos/xupv2pro/patches/linuxppc-2.6.17_sysace.patch
-Ameet
Ming Liu wrote:
> Dear Ameet,
> Could you please give me a copy of your new driver for SystemACE?
> Regards
> Ming
>
>
&g
Hi Ming,
Excellent News!
Don't worry... the problem you are facing could be because of missing
device files in your /dev folder.
Do as follows:
mount the CF card onto your PC and then goto the /dev folder on your
root filesystem in the card. Here run the following commands as root:
# mknod -m 66
Hi Ming,
If your Xilinx EDK generates the xparameters_ml300.h file for the
ML403 board then it has been configured with the right parameters and
address required by Linux. Don't look at the existing
xparameters_ml403.h file in the kernel source. It has got too many
parameters with address initia
Hi Ming,
I DONOT have a ML403 with me. But does Xilinx EDK generate
xparameters_ml300.h in the BSP instead of xparameters_ml403.h for the
ML403 board?
Anyway, for linux 2.6 theres no xilinx_ocp directory in the code tree.
You need to just copy the xparameters_ml300.h file (if that is what
xilinx
Grant Likely wrote:
> On 6/30/06, Ameet Patil wrote:
>> Here is PART I of the article:
>> http://www.linux.get2knowmore.com/2006/06/30/quick-guide-linux-26-on-xilinx-virtex-ii-pro-boards-part-i/
>>
>>
>>
>> Let me know if you get messages at boot time after
Here is PART I of the article:
http://www.linux.get2knowmore.com/2006/06/30/quick-guide-linux-26-on-xilinx-virtex-ii-pro-boards-part-i/
Let me know if you get messages at boot time after following the above...
PART II we be posted shortly!
-Ameet
Ming Liu wrote:
> Hello Ameet,
>
>> Do you have
Hi Ming,
Ming Liu wrote:
> Hi friend,
> I have tried your patch for SystemACE. Unfortunately, it looks that I got
> some problem. I applied the patch and compile the kernel. There are some
> XPAR_... parameters defination missing. So I include the xpamameters header
> file( I use the xparameter
Hi Sudheer,
Sorry, I ate my words there. I meant - I shall soon be posting a
patch that contains my port of the SystemAce driver for 2.6 kernel.
-Ameet
> sudheer wrote:
>> Hi Ameet,
>>
>> Your mail is not clear.
>>
>>
>> Ameet Patil wrote:
>>
Here is the patch containing the SysAce driver for 2.6 Linux kernel.
http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/rtslab/demos/amos/xupv2pro/patches/linuxppc-2.6.17_sysace.patch
Please test it and let me know in case of any issues!
cheers,
-Ameet
Ameet Patil wrote:
> Hi,
>I have ported System Ace drive
Hi,
I have ported System Ace driver from 2.4 to 2.6. Please post the
patch soon.
-Ameet
Hi,
I have a XUPV2Pro Xilinx Embedded PPC405 board which is similar in
many respects to the ML3XX series. With good support in the kernel
source tree, I was easily able to compile the 2.4.26 linux kernel to run
on it.
However, I wanted 2.6 kernel to run on it. For some reason, the Xilinx
dr
43 matches
Mail list logo
