Re: [Linuxptp-devel] unknown option ntpshm_segment at line 8 in eno1 section

2015-07-31 Thread Gary E. Miller
Yo Jacob E! On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 18:46:21 + "Keller, Jacob E" wrote: > > Any thing I missed? Or can this be fixed? > > I don't believe this is currently supportable, Yup, currently broken. > since we only create > one clock for each instance of ptp4l, and that clock would be the one > gen

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] unknown option ntpshm_segment at line 8 in eno1 section

2015-07-31 Thread Keller, Jacob E
On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 18:16 +, Gary E. Miller wrote: > Yo All! > > I'd like a config file change to the ptp4l config file. > > In this case I have a server with two ethernet segments, and I want > each > one to be on its own SHM. I would like to be able to do this: > > [global] >

[Linuxptp-devel] unknown option ntpshm_segment at line 8 in eno1 section

2015-07-31 Thread Gary E. Miller
Yo All! I'd like a config file change to the ptp4l config file. In this case I have a server with two ethernet segments, and I want each one to be on its own SHM. I would like to be able to do this: [global] uds_address /var/run/ptp4l clock_servo ntpshm [eno1] ntpshm