Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH RFC V1 00/18] NetSync Monitor support

2018-01-09 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 09:02:52PM -0800, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 03:56:29PM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > > You mean asymmetry added by boundary clocks on the path to the > > grandmaster? > > Yes, or from any other source at all. It's not clear to me how would that wo

[Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH] sk: Restrict warnings about drivers changing RX filter.

2018-01-09 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
When the filter used by the driver is different from the requested filter, don't print the warning if the driver reports that the requested filter is not supported, i.e. it is expected that it will be changed to a more general filter. Signed-off-by: Miroslav Lichvar --- sk.c | 15 +++

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH RFC V1 00/18] NetSync Monitor support

2018-01-09 Thread Richard Cochran
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 11:09:43AM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > It's not clear to me how would that work. Let's say I have a > grandmaster GM, slave S and monitoring node N, and I don't know how > much asymmetry is there on any of the paths GM-S, GM-N and S-N. How > will measuring offset of GM

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH] sk: Restrict warnings about drivers changing RX filter.

2018-01-09 Thread Richard Cochran
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 04:23:43PM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > When the filter used by the driver is different from the requested > filter, don't print the warning if the driver reports that the requested > filter is not supported, i.e. it is expected that it will be changed to > a more genera

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH] sk: Restrict warnings about drivers changing RX filter.

2018-01-09 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 07:54:13AM -0800, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 04:23:43PM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > > When the filter used by the driver is different from the requested > > filter, don't print the warning if the driver reports that the requested > > filter is not

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH RFC V1 00/18] NetSync Monitor support

2018-01-09 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 07:52:11AM -0800, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 11:09:43AM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > > It's not clear to me how would that work. Let's say I have a > > grandmaster GM, slave S and monitoring node N, and I don't know how > > much asymmetry is there o

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH] sk: Restrict warnings about drivers changing RX filter.

2018-01-09 Thread Chris Perl
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > > An advantage of this patch is that we will get warnings about drivers > incorrectly reporting supported filters, like with the X550 for > instance. Perhaps slightly off topic, but what filters does the X550 say it supports but doesn't?

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH] sk: Restrict warnings about drivers changing RX filter.

2018-01-09 Thread Keller, Jacob E
> -Original Message- > From: Chris Perl [mailto:cp...@janestreet.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2018 3:07 PM > To: Miroslav Lichvar > Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH] sk: Restrict warnings about drivers > changing RX filter. > > On Tue, J