On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 05:29:32PM -0700, Richard Cochran wrote:
> Based on Erez's review, I expanded Christopher's patch to remove the
> control field codes completely. I've tested this with the following
> hardware, and nothing broke:
>
> Intel I210
> Intel X550T
> LabX Titanium 411 AVB switch
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 02:58:33PM +0100, Andrew Zaborowski wrote:
> I was now made aware that Avnu conformance tests for 802.1AS-2011 do
> validate the 3 different values required in the control field in that
> version of IEEE802.1AS. While 1588-2008 did already say that the use
> of this field
Based on Erez's review, I expanded Christopher's patch to remove the
control field codes completely. I've tested this with the following
hardware, and nothing broke:
Intel I210
Intel X550T
LabX Titanium 411 AVB switch
Please give this a try with your favorite hardware time stamping
device. I'd
From: Christopher S M Hall
IEEE1588-2019 and 802.1AS-2020 both require the field to be 0 in
transmitted messages except when the "version 1 hardware option" is set
(IEEE1588-2019 C.4.2) and only with IPv4. Since ptp4l isn't padding
the UDP messages to 124 bytes as required for compatibility with
