Re: [Linuxptp-devel] Is intel i350 ptp driver broken?

2023-05-26 Thread egg car
lin.com/linux/v5.19.17/C/ident/ts>.tv_sec > <https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.19.17/C/ident/tv_sec> = rd32 > <https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.19.17/C/ident/rd32>(auxstmph); > } > > here the driver does treat the AUXSTMPH resolution and valid bits in the r

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] Is intel i350 ptp driver broken?

2023-05-26 Thread egg car
nd in this case all the timestamp regs cannot be used directly. Needs more time to find out how to fix this, either the driver or 'ts2phc' program. egg car 于2023年5月26日周五 11:35写道: > Hi Frantisek, > > Thanks for your detailed explanation, that makes things clear. > > you'

Re: [Linuxptp-devel] Is intel i350 ptp driver broken?

2023-05-25 Thread egg car
> fail, the subsequent continuous convergence would last pretty long... > I have the same doubts with that, if I didn't miss something elsewhere, the driver never write SYSTIMx value to the chip, how they made i350 work with PTP? Or just no one have ever tested that before? I'

[Linuxptp-devel] Is intel i350 ptp driver broken?

2023-05-25 Thread egg car
Hi, I'm trying to use i350 adapter with a hardware 1pps signal input on a SDP pin. I'm testing on kernel 5.19(i350 hardware ts capture function was announced to be supported since kernel 5.17), using 'ts2phc' program could capture the 1PPS input event, but it failed to write time adjustment to th