On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:43:22PM +, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
> what about using hsearch(3)? from #include
Didn't know about that. Learn something new every day. Yes, let's
use it.
Thanks,
Richard
--
New Year. New
On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 08:06 +0100, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 01:01:11AM +, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
> > Is there a standard implementation of a HASH similar to STAIL_QUEUE?
>
> Not that I know of, but I do have a small, generic C implementation
> sitting around somewhere.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 01:01:11AM +, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
> Is there a standard implementation of a HASH similar to STAIL_QUEUE?
Not that I know of, but I do have a small, generic C implementation
sitting around somewhere. I will get it into shape and then post it.
Thanks,
Richard
--
On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 20:15 +0100, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 06:05:07PM +, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 12:42 +0100, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:03:42PM +, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
> > > > What about section settings for t
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 06:05:07PM +, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 12:42 +0100, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:03:42PM +, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
> > > What about section settings for things like the per-adapter stuff? This
> > > is where it got reall
On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 12:42 +0100, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:03:42PM +, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
> >
> > I can look at this though it will take a lot more real time since I have
> > less to dedicate to it. But I am interested in solving this.
>
> If you are agreeable,
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:03:42PM +, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
>
> I can look at this though it will take a lot more real time since I have
> less to dedicate to it. But I am interested in solving this.
If you are agreeable, then I would say let's take the extra time to do
it right. We just cu
On Sun, 2015-01-11 at 12:01 +0100, Richard Cochran wrote:
> Jacob,
>
> I am glad to see this patch series. With all of its command line
> options, having a configuration file for phc2sys would be a usability
> improvement.
>
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 04:16:28PM -0800, Jacob Keller wrote:
> > I d
This series adds phc2sys configuration file support. Right now all the
command line options are supported. Like ptp4l, any existing command
line arguments supersede configuration file. Also, while the generic
options which appear to be simlar for both ptp4l and phc2sys are read
from [global], all o
