On 3/9/2020 7:27 AM, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 07:16:23 -0700, Richard Cochran wrote:
>> But maybe that wouldn't be worst thing in the world. There is a trade
>> off between maintaining parallel copies of ptp_clock_caps and the
>> convenience of compiling the stack just once with the
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 07:16:23 -0700, Richard Cochran wrote:
> But maybe that wouldn't be worst thing in the world. There is a trade
> off between maintaining parallel copies of ptp_clock_caps and the
> convenience of compiling the stack just once with the "future" kernel
> definitions.
>
>
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 11:55:05AM +0100, Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Mar 2020 11:23:00 -0800, Richard Cochran wrote:
> > +int phc_number_pins(clockid_t clkid)
> > +{
> > + struct ptp_clock_caps caps;
> > +
> > + if (phc_get_caps(clkid, )) {
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +#ifdef
On Fri, 6 Mar 2020 11:23:00 -0800, Richard Cochran wrote:
> +int phc_number_pins(clockid_t clkid)
> +{
> + struct ptp_clock_caps caps;
> +
> + if (phc_get_caps(clkid, )) {
> + return 0;
> + }
> +#ifdef HAVE_PIN_SETFUNC
> + return caps.n_pins;
> +#else
> + return 0;
In anticipation of support for external time stamping in PHC devices, this
patch adds wrapper functions around the pin functionality.
Signed-off-by: Richard Cochran
---
phc.c | 30 --
phc.h | 21 +
2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
