Re: [Linuxptp-users] IEEE802.1AS gPTP Boundary Clock

2023-02-08 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 07:39:48PM -0800, Richard Cochran wrote: > Sure, if you have a chain topology of 15 hops, then you would start to > see benefits from using TAB over BC. But who has that kind of network? > > Even then, would an 802.1as TAB outperform an ieee 1588 TC? The draft I saw claim

Re: [Linuxptp-users] IEEE802.1AS gPTP Boundary Clock

2023-02-08 Thread Richard Cochran
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 09:33:49AM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 07:39:48PM -0800, Richard Cochran wrote: > > Sure, if you have a chain topology of 15 hops, then you would start to > > see benefits from using TAB over BC. But who has that kind of network? > > > > Even t

Re: [Linuxptp-users] IEEE802.1AS gPTP Boundary Clock

2023-02-08 Thread Nemo Crypto
Hi Richard, Thanks for your valuable inputs. 802.1AS is chosen not for better performance in this particular case, but because we should be using Automovitve Profile and compliant to AVnu gPTP standard.But I agree with you, I am waiting for the prototype HW to see how ptp4l BC functions with

Re: [Linuxptp-users] IEEE802.1AS gPTP Boundary Clock

2023-02-08 Thread Nemo Crypto
What does NIH mean? Not Invented Here? On Wednesday, 8 February, 2023 at 10:18:21 am GMT-5, Richard Cochran wrote: On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 09:33:49AM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 07:39:48PM -0800, Richard Cochran wrote: > > Sure, if you have a chain topology

Re: [Linuxptp-users] IEEE802.1AS gPTP Boundary Clock

2023-02-08 Thread Richard Cochran
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 08:28:54PM +, Nemo Crypto wrote: > What does NIH mean? Not Invented Here? yes. ___ Linuxptp-users mailing list Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users