On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 09:33:49AM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 07:39:48PM -0800, Richard Cochran wrote: > > Sure, if you have a chain topology of 15 hops, then you would start to > > see benefits from using TAB over BC. But who has that kind of network? > > > > Even then, would an 802.1as TAB outperform an ieee 1588 TC? > > The draft I saw claimed that the synchronization performance of the > network is identical to 1588 using P2P TCs. It's not clear to me what > advantages their approach has.
gPTP is full of NIH, IMO. > BTW, synchronization with BCs can work better than TCs if the PLLs are > well implemented and tuned. TCs are the simpler and safer approach. There was a simulation study showing "gain peaking" from a long chain of servos. Thanks, Richard _______________________________________________ Linuxptp-users mailing list Linuxptp-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users
