On 07/07/2016 07:56 PM, RDP wrote:
> On 6 July 2016 at 17:28, Christian Schoenebeck
> wrote:
[..]
>> Anyway, I approved your forum user, so you should be able to post now on all
>> forums without moderation. And I also changed the board's settings so that
>> newly registered users can at least imm
On Thursday, July 07, 2016 18:56:40 RDP wrote:
> > Anyway, I approved your forum user, so you should be able to post now on
> > all forums without moderation. And I also changed the board's settings so
> > that newly registered users can at least immediately post on the "Newbies
> > & Support" sect
On 6 July 2016 at 17:28, Christian Schoenebeck
wrote:
> On Sunday, July 03, 2016 20:12:12 RDP wrote:
>> On 2 July 2016 at 12:47, Christian Schoenebeck
>>
>> wrote:
> I was not even aware that posts of newly registered users were forced for
> moderation. Quite a bunch of permission levels with php
On Sunday, July 03, 2016 20:12:12 RDP wrote:
> On 2 July 2016 at 12:47, Christian Schoenebeck
>
> wrote:
> > Well, you can simply start a topic on bb.linuxsampler.org and update your
> > (i.e. upper most) post with the latest version of the text. Of course I
> > can
> > also make a separate forum
On 2 July 2016 at 12:47, Christian Schoenebeck
wrote:
> Well, you can simply start a topic on bb.linuxsampler.org and update your
> (i.e. upper most) post with the latest version of the text. Of course I can
> also make a separate forum section and make the specific thread with the
> license text
On Wednesday, June 29, 2016 21:09:20 Robin Gareus wrote:
> On 06/29/2016 08:17 PM, RDP wrote:
> > On 28 June 2016 at 23:12, Robin Gareus wrote:
> >> On 06/28/2016 11:39 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> >>> .. if you really want license issues to be addressed, sit down,
> >>> elaborate and sugges
On 29 June 2016 at 20:09, Robin Gareus wrote:
>> Might it not be a good idea for this discussion to be taken here,
>>
>>http://bb.linuxsampler.org/
>>
>> .. with some drafts published ( wiki style ), so that such a beast
>> can be formalised?
>>
>
> wiki-style sounds good to me. As to where I
On 06/29/2016 08:17 PM, RDP wrote:
> On 28 June 2016 at 23:12, Robin Gareus wrote:
>> On 06/28/2016 11:39 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
>
>>> .. if you really want license issues to be addressed, sit down, elaborate
>>> and suggest
>>> clear license terms by yourself which could become a cand
On 28 June 2016 at 23:12, Robin Gareus wrote:
> On 06/28/2016 11:39 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
>> .. if you really want license issues to be addressed, sit down, elaborate
>> and suggest
>> clear license terms by yourself which could become a candidate to resolve
>> those overall
>> issue
On 06/28/2016 11:39 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> However writing such a long new license text takes a load of free time (which
> is already quite limited on my side), energy, research and finally a clear
> consent by the developers.
I understand. I am however of the strong opinion that o
On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 23:32:34 Robin Gareus wrote:
> On 06/28/2016 10:20 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > You know the terms under which LinuxSampler is released, its
> > clearly and prominently written on the website
>
> Sadly no, those terms as self contradictory and hence invalid.
> One
On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 22:24:08 you wrote:
> On 06/28/2016 10:20 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > Robin, please understand that this issue had been discussed over and over
> > again on this list. So please refer to the list archive on this one. You
> > are really not adding anything new on t
On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 22:16:41 Robin Gareus wrote:
> I'd like users to respect the intention of the authors of this IMHO
> great software. But I very much wish for these intentions to be clearly
> solidified by a proper license (until a time comes where software
> licensing becomes irrelevant).
On 06/28/2016 10:20 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> You know the terms under which LinuxSampler is released, its
> clearly and prominently written on the website
Sadly no, those terms as self contradictory and hence invalid.
One can only assume or guess your intentions.
You're on the safe sid
On 06/28/2016 10:20 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> Robin, please understand that this issue had been discussed over and over
> again on this list. So please refer to the list archive on this one. You are
> really not adding anything new on this topic and this has also been discussed
> with s
Sorry for this self-reply follow up post, I forgot to include a
pertinent reference.
On 06/28/2016 09:41 PM, Robin Gareus wrote:
>> That commercial exception, being ( snipped and quoted for the sake of
>> pedantism ),
>>
>> '..under the GNU GPL with the exception that USAGE of the source code,
>>
On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 21:41:20 Robin Gareus wrote:
> > That commercial exception, being ( snipped and quoted for the sake of
> > pedantism ),
> >
> > '..under the GNU GPL with the exception that USAGE of the source code,
> > libraries and applications *FOR* COMMERCIAL HARDWARE OR SOFTWARE
> >
> That commercial exception, being ( snipped and quoted for the sake of
> pedantism ),
>
> '..under the GNU GPL with the exception that USAGE of the source code,
> libraries and applications *FOR* COMMERCIAL HARDWARE OR SOFTWARE
> PRODUCTS IS NOT ALLOWED without prior written permission..'
GPL s
18 matches
Mail list logo
