On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 08:04:00AM +0200, Eduard Hasenleithner wrote:
> 2011/9/29 Peter Hutterer :
> >> Ah, finally I understand the whole picture which Ping wanted me (us)
> >> to tell. I see it similar. When looking at the 4 leds, I'm seeing
> >> something like a software settable "rotary selecti
2011/9/29 Peter Hutterer :
>> Ah, finally I understand the whole picture which Ping wanted me (us)
>> to tell. I see it similar. When looking at the 4 leds, I'm seeing
>> something like a software settable "rotary selection switch".
>> Applications want to be informed immediately when the value cha
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 06:28:39PM -0700, Ping Cheng wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Peter Hutterer
> wrot
> >> We can make the "xsetwacom led" a get and set command (instead of
> >> get-only). If end users can set led status, the following may happen:
> >> one user/app may change the s
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Peter Hutterer wrot
>> We can make the "xsetwacom led" a get and set command (instead of
>> get-only). If end users can set led status, the following may happen:
>> one user/app may change the status while the other wants it unchanged.
>> How do we avoid this kind
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 08:36:47PM +0200, Eduard Hasenleithner wrote:
> Hi
>
> 2011/9/28 Ping Cheng :
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Peter Hutterer
> > wrote:
> >> sorry, I'm just going to reply to this message here instead of each of them
> >> in the thread because otherwise my answers wou
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:05:35AM -0700, Ping Cheng wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Peter Hutterer
> wrote:
> > sorry, I'm just going to reply to this message here instead of each of them
> > in the thread because otherwise my answers would be too split up. Also, I'm
> > a bit confused
Hi
2011/9/28 Ping Cheng :
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Peter Hutterer
> wrote:
>> sorry, I'm just going to reply to this message here instead of each of them
>> in the thread because otherwise my answers would be too split up. Also, I'm
>> a bit confused because some of the msgs in this thr
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Peter Hutterer
wrote:
> sorry, I'm just going to reply to this message here instead of each of them
> in the thread because otherwise my answers would be too split up. Also, I'm
> a bit confused because some of the msgs in this thread seem contradictory.
>
> One im
Dnia 2011-09-27, wto o godzinie 11:56 +0200, Eduard Hasenleithner pisze:
[..]
> First, I don't know. The windows driver (AFAIR) allows to set it, and
> it is provided by the kernel module. Second, we have actually three
> luminances:
> 1) OLED matrix display luminance
> 2) luminance of status led w
sorry, I'm just going to reply to this message here instead of each of them
in the thread because otherwise my answers would be too split up. Also, I'm
a bit confused because some of the msgs in this thread seem contradictory.
One important thing that I want to point out: xf86-input-wacom is an X
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 09:58:56AM -0700, Ping Cheng wrote:
> >> >>> TODO:
> >> >>> * Add function for setting the status led
> >> >>
> >> >> I am working on patches to support this function as well as retrieving
> >> >> the LED status from the kernel. The code is for linuxwacom, the older
> >> >>
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:56:04AM +0200, Eduard Hasenleithner wrote:
> >> * Add function for setting luminance
> >
> > make the status led a 2-value property, first one to set which led, second
> > one to set the luminance.
> >
> > do we really care about luminance on the OLEDs?
>
> First, I don'
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Eduard Hasenleithner
wrote:
>> Yes, and no. Yes for the led to provide new app functions. No if you
>> think we are going to report the LED through XInput valuators. Due to
>> backward compatibility, we will not report LED as a new axis. It will
>> only be reported
Hi.
2011/9/27 Ping Cheng :
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Eduard Hasenleithner
> wrote:
>> So let me summarize: The only important point of the function selector
>> (led) is to provide another axis to the X11 client application.
>> The X11 client is free to decide on what to do with the addi
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Eduard Hasenleithner
wrote:
>> We are on the page here. Besides the touch ring, the leds also tell
>> users which set of expresskey functions they can use though.
>
> This is because of there are no expresskey displays, right?
If you consider the LED as a propert
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 5:30 AM, Eduard Hasenleithner
wrote:
> But this is not exactly what the touch ring was designed for. It was
> designed for things like zooming in/out, cycle layers in photoshop,
> change the brush size, etc. In order to avoid the need for multiple
> touch rings, four functi
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Peter Hutterer
wrote:
>> TODO:
>> * Add function for setting the status led
>> * Add function for setting luminance
>
> make the status led a 2-value property, first one to set which led, second
> one to set the luminance.
I would prefer we have separate properti
>> >>> TODO:
>> >>> * Add function for setting the status led
>> >>
>> >> I am working on patches to support this function as well as retrieving
>> >> the LED status from the kernel. The code is for linuxwacom, the older
>> >> X servers, right now. I need to submit the kernel patch that adds
>> >>
Hi Ping.
2011/9/27 Ping Cheng :
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Eduard Hasenleithner
> wrote:
>> 2011/9/27 Ping Cheng :
>>> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Eduard Hasenleithner
>>> wrote:
TODO:
* Add function for setting the status led
>>>
>>> I am working on patches to support thi
Hi Peter.
Thanks for the detailled comments.
2011/9/27 Peter Hutterer :
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 10:23:13PM +0200, Eduard Hasenleithner wrote:
>> Linux kernels starting with version number 3.2 are supposed to have
>> the LED extensions included in the wacom driver. This commit provides
>> a firs
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 05:01:00PM -0700, Ping Cheng wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Eduard Hasenleithner
> wrote:
> > Hi Ping
> >
> > Thanks for the ACK.
> >
> > 2011/9/27 Ping Cheng :
> >> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Eduard Hasenleithner
> >> wrote:
> >>> TODO:
> >>> * Add functi
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 10:23:13PM +0200, Eduard Hasenleithner wrote:
> Linux kernels starting with version number 3.2 are supposed to have
> the LED extensions included in the wacom driver. This commit provides
> a first demonstration on how the new interface might be exposed by
> means of xsetwac
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Eduard Hasenleithner
wrote:
> Hi Ping
>
> Thanks for the ACK.
>
> 2011/9/27 Ping Cheng :
>> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Eduard Hasenleithner
>> wrote:
>>> TODO:
>>> * Add function for setting the status led
>>
>> I am working on patches to support this functi
Hi Ping
Thanks for the ACK.
2011/9/27 Ping Cheng :
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Eduard Hasenleithner
> wrote:
>> TODO:
>> * Add function for setting the status led
>
> I am working on patches to support this function as well as retrieving
> the LED status from the kernel. The code is for l
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Eduard Hasenleithner
wrote:
> Linux kernels starting with version number 3.2 are supposed to have
> the LED extensions included in the wacom driver. This commit provides
> a first demonstration on how the new interface might be exposed by
> means of xsetwacom.
>
>
Linux kernels starting with version number 3.2 are supposed to have
the LED extensions included in the wacom driver. This commit provides
a first demonstration on how the new interface might be exposed by
means of xsetwacom.
The basic mechanism for passing the Button images between the
xsetwacom t
26 matches
Mail list logo
