Thanks, just confirming that the regression doesn't occur anymore on the
current isdv4 branch. Sorry it took me so long to respond.
Tom
On 03/09/2010 12:43 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 12:16:00PM -0600, Chris Bagwell wrote:
Have we verified yet if these ISDV4 devices
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Thomas Jaeger thjae...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, just confirming that the regression doesn't occur anymore on the
current isdv4 branch. Sorry it took me so long to respond.
Tom
On 03/09/2010 12:43 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 12:16:00PM
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 03:26:26AM -0500, Thomas Jaeger wrote:
Thanks, just confirming that the regression doesn't occur anymore on the
current isdv4 branch. Sorry it took me so long to respond.
Hi Tom,
Thanks much for testing! Can you just do me another favour, can you test the
current devel
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 02:40:17AM -0500, Thomas Jaeger wrote:
I see a regression introduced in dc513e8e1e6813e6d8d0f101a56fbf1b2f388dbc:
Strokes are noticeably less smooth, they look more like sequences of
line segments. My guess is that this is either due to increased jitter
or to a reduced
Have we verified yet if these ISDV4 devices return 2 sizes of packets?
The logic in isdv4Parse() reads to me like it must or else your only
going to be able to parse pen data or touch data but not both.
This development branch changes things so that packet size is only
computed in
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 10:13:49PM -0800, Ping Cheng wrote:
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Peter Hutterer
peter.hutte...@who-t.netwrote:
I think I may have it now, thanks much for the pointers. The patch is
attached but it also needs a revert of the Remove superfluous
packet-length
