William X. Walsh wrote:
(Victims of Jeff's CC list removed for their sanity's sake)
Sure william, more like to eliviate some embarrassment here...
On 03-Dec-99 Jeff Williams wrote:
William and all,
I can only venture a guess that you are referencing Bob's message
below??? If
Philippa and all,
One wonders if you are not related?
In any event, I believe there is a form for this process.
Measday, Philippa wrote:
Due to work commitments, I am not able to accept the nomination for the GA
Chair. However, perhaps instead I could nominate Mark Measday for this
Redmond, Wash. Nov. 11. 1999
In direct response to accusations made the Department of
Justice, the Microsoft Corp. announced today that it will
be acquiring the federal government of the United States
of America for an undisclosed sum. "Its actually a
logical extension of our planned
Jay Fenello [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quotes Scott McConnell, whose work
apparently was on a Pat Buchanan website, as writing
After Seattle, it looks like real democracy may be starting
up again.
I see it quite differently. I suspect the vast majority of protestors in
Seattle would be *dead
I guess this is an IFWP issue as well (see below).
Comments appreciated.
_
ICQ:35638414mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pawlo.com/
All,
Ahhh what evil webs (Pardon the pun), the ICANN/DNSO weaves,
eh? Again for you Javier, here is some more meat to which you
referred earlier to David Jenson.
Mail Delivery Subsystem wrote:
The original message was received at Fri, 3 Dec 1999 15:25:18 -0500 (EST)
from
Patrick and all,
Well Patrick, in this instance you are in part correct. I believe
some time ago Ed Gerik posted several series of posts along
these lines as "Trust Models". Very excellent ones as I recall,
isn't that correct Ed? Chime in here guy!
The problem with the disjointed and
DEar Dnso Admin,
This is of course false and slanderous in every person that you have
presented. Please discontinue this slanderous and false practice
forth with.
This is another example and a bold one at that of living in denial.
The DNSO, IFWP, ORSC, IAHC, and ICANN own mailing list
show
Laura and all,
Thank you very much for your comments and dialoge here Laura,
it is much appritiated by myself and I am sure with many of our
[INEGroup's] members as well a the NCDNHC.
In your comments you did not address some of my questions
directly that I had posed to Kathy and the NCDNH
At 07:37 PM 12/3/99 -0800, Jeff Williams wrote:
Mikael and all,
I would guess in sense it is yes. However I have spoken to Richard
Irrelevant. I demand to be added to the list of fake poeple
and could Kent throw me in his mail filter too please?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
William and all,
Unfortunately this is not true of Roberto as the archives of
several mailing lists have shown time and time again.
Even you William have stated just the opposite on more than
one occasion. So please spare me and everyone else the
bull shit...
William X. Walsh wrote:
On
Patrick and all,
Yes your need of psychiatric attention is evident here with this obvious
slur attempt, a la William Walsh style. So similar indeed they are.
But occasionally you come out of the seeming cloud of psychiatric
bliss with some relevance of common sense, even in this post...
Richard and all,
ROFLMAO! Nice and appropriate response here Richard.
God I love you sense of humor. These folks are really something
Eh??
Richard J. Sexton wrote:
At 07:37 PM 12/3/99 -0800, Jeff Williams wrote:
Mikael and all,
I would guess in sense it is yes. However I have
Path: ns3.vrx.net!not-for-mail
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard J. Sexton)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains
Subject: New whois.c
Date: 3 Dec 1999 22:38:18 -0500
Organization: none
Lines: 19
Message-ID: 82a2ba$34d$[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NNTP-Posting-Host: ns1.vrx.net
Xref: ns3.vrx.net
Joop and all,
I am sure all of the so called "Watchdogs" would be foaming at the
mouth or something very similar Good point here though Joop!
It is a shame that some within the DNSO, most especially it's
NC and now this sham of a "Watchdog" bunch have turned
and manipulated the DNSO
Richard and all,
Thanks Richard, this is ery helpful. Joe seems to have outdone himself.
Richard J. Sexton (At work) wrote:
Path: ns3.vrx.net!not-for-mail
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard J. Sexton)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains
Subject: New whois.c
Date: 3 Dec 1999
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member submission from [Bob Davis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 1999 01:09:28 -0500 (EST)
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 4 01:09:27
17 matches
Mail list logo
