I am more patient. I think that you and others are doing a good job of
pressing for the right structure that would command trust and legitimacy.
It is not that I am uncritical. It is that so long as I see movement I will
not make a final judgment. Further, I do not believe that ICANN is a sham.
Sh
Path:
ns3.vrx.net!news2.best.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!burlma1-snr2!not-for-mail
From: Barry Margolin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains
Subject: Re: NSI may revoke 100's of domains
References: <85kita$625$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <85m
Path:
ns3.vrx.net!news2.best.com!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!sanjose-news-feed1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!nntp.mainstreet.net!bug.rahul.net!samba.rahul.net!rahul.net!a2i!dhesi.a2i!dhesi
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rahul Dhesi)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains
Subject:
At 08:30 AM 1/14/00 , Tamar Frankel wrote:
>In the US legitimacy is gained more by the trustworthiness of the system
>than that of the leadership. We trust the banks but not necessarily the
>bankers. We trust the constitution and political system but not necessarily
>the politicians. This balance
>Don't attempt to use my name in any way to sell your load of crap. I'm
>being very sincere here.
Me too. In fact if anybody has a printed copy of the WIPO report please
take a thick black permanent marker and strike out my name in the back.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTE
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> >my name to be used in this joke you call an election or nomination
> >process. I refuse to participate in a question that is another NC hoax.
>
> Interesting: You want to have an opinion, but you do not want it recorded.
> You don't even
