i don't think the cctld's are very happy - it looks all cat and mouse to
me.
On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
> At 02:31 AM 2/16/00 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> >I am under the impression that by swtiching dot.pn over to the islanders
> >is going to cause a bit of a problem for ICANN - h
At 02:31 AM 2/16/00 -0500, you wrote:
>
>I am under the impression that by swtiching dot.pn over to the islanders
>is going to cause a bit of a problem for ICANN - have not the cctld
>operators formed a pack - if one goes - the whole lot walks.
You're saying there'll be a mutiny ?
--
[EMAIL PR
And miss all the fun? Tish tosh.
At 06:28 AM 2/16/00 +0100, you wrote:
>Jeff
>
>Delighted, dear boy. Your new-found concern for res publicae is
>meritorious, though some may find it tedious. Should we not do this
>privately, to avoid inconveniencing the good people of this list?
>
>
>Best,
>
>
>M
I am under the impression that by swtiching dot.pn over to the islanders
is going to cause a bit of a problem for ICANN - have not the cctld
operators formed a pack - if one goes - the whole lot walks.
Cairo should be entertaining.
Regards
Joe Baptista
Joe and all,
Ohh yes, agreed Joe. And yes very helpful.
!Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
> Well - I don't know if you remember Jeff - I once gave you my impression
> of what domain space is all about. I'm of the opinion that we should just
> serialize the dictionary and use URL's as we would use
Jeff
Delighted, dear boy. Your new-found concern for res publicae is
meritorious, though some may find it tedious. Should we not do this
privately, to avoid inconveniencing the good people of this list?
Best,
Mark Measday
Jeff Williams wrote:
> Mark and all,
>
> Mark, thank you for the in
Well - I don't know if you remember Jeff - I once gave you my impression
of what domain space is all about. I'm of the opinion that we should just
serialize the dictionary and use URL's as we would use natural
language. I think alot of user would find that sort of thing helpful.
Regards
Joe Bap
Joe and all,
Feel free to distribute this post at your discretion
I was thinking about another for the "Tech Heads", like .clue or dot.clue.
I have been thinking this would be good for William Walsh's Tool/Toy
for instance something like walshhasnt.clue or WXWno.clue for instance.
Of cou
Hello,
And welcome to the inaugural issue of Aligning with
Purpose(sm). My name is Jay Fenello, and each week,
I'll be writing about government, politics, activism,
morality, media bias, and how our current mythology
prevents us from realizing our highest ideals.
In case you are wondering who
http://dns.vrx.net/sys/whois?otters.com
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dnso.com
Science does not emerge from voting, party politics, or public debate.
- Mark Crispin
Oh - I would never operate a wholesome family values service name
space. It's too much overhead. I'm going to have fun with the tld's I
have .god, .satan, .doctor and .cum for the perverts. .god and .satan are
excellent tld's - at least 2000 years of world wide hard marketing. Long
before the
Well that's the issue here. It's critical that we stop playing games and
get on with the business of establishing the GA. Roberto imposed rules -
so fine - i can live with rules - in fact I live for rules. Of course I
preffer rules that are fair an decent and for the common good. But I can
als
Joe and all,
Those that you mention here, (The four Horse-shitters) don't want
an open or transparent process or membership, just a "Club". That is fine
I suppose, but hardly representative of anything legitimately
!Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
> I'm cross posting this to make sure other memb
James and all,
I am in agreement with you here James. Thanks for the info though.
It seems the plot thickens or sickens, depending on you point of view! >;)
I personally find this whole mess far more complicated than it needs
or should be. But that is just my opinion, I may be wrong...
J
Joe,
Could you possibly send me the original on this? I would like to get it
out on some search engines for reference purposes if that is ok with you?
This one (See below) is just too heavily censored to be of much use
as I see it. What are your thoughts?
!Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
> This
Harald,
Well Harald, I just received a call from Dillon letting me know he
tried to contact you and left you a phone message. I guess you were
not in at the moment or not reachable. To bad, it is my information
you wanted to "Chat" with Dillon. It appears now that that is a
pointless exercis
Mark and all,
Mark, thank you for the information as your legal reference. However
as they are predisposed to potentially represent you in this matter
as you advocate, I would prefer more public vetting. In that interest,
I will be submitting several referral postings coming from you to the
w
I'm cross posting this to make sure other members of the community can
follow this insanity.
I and Walsh agree that for the GA@DNSO to get any works of substance done,
it is critical that we meet the chairs and NC's definition of real
person. Yes - the chair and alternate have avoided this issu
Joe and all,
Thanks Joe. And you too Jamie Good info here. It seems that some
correction of ICANN's ways is getting underway in a much broader scale.
It is long past due. That is if I am reading this stuff right. I will pass
it along
as well to our members.
Jamie or Michael, what are the
At the recent TACD meeting, DOC and the FTC both emphasized that the US
government was pushing ICANN to provide valid information regarding
ownership of domains to assist in law enforcement actions and to protect
intellectual property owners.
I think it would be useful for ICANN to have a green
This is a juicy tid bit. Of course Roberto won't be getting this
one. The IAEA's anti spam list seems to be getting a little ratty, And
offensive to a major government. This is a choice tid bit which I will
have to forward to the highest authorities in the IAEA.
I tell ya folks - when you di
21 matches
Mail list logo
