Jay Fenello wrote:
Exactly the opposite of what we were told:
"The Commission has confirmed to the US authorities that the powers
retained by the United States DoC regarding ICANN should be effectively
divested, as foreseen in the US White Paper. The necessary governmental
oversight of
http://stlr.stanford.edu/STLR/Working_Papers/00_Rotenberg_1
This is a working paper, so please do not cite it without the author's
permission.
I gave the paper a quick read, and there's nothing in it that's directly
related to ICANN.
--gregbo
wrong url - try
http://stlr.stanford.edu/STLR/Working_Papers/00_rotenberg_1/index.htm
On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Greg Skinner wrote:
http://stlr.stanford.edu/STLR/Working_Papers/00_Rotenberg_1
This is a working paper, so please do not cite it without the author's
permission.
I gave the paper
A few people have contacted me with respect to alternate root servers and
a prior post to domain policy. So I've made this report of known root
server confederation and what nameservers were pointing to them.
I may make the actual data file available is there's enough interest - in
any case
I just went through my little list here and found something interesting -
one service http://www.mobiledns.com/ offers alternate roots to .web tld's
and private tld's to their customers.
Very inovative of them
On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Joe Baptista wrote:
A few people have contacted me with
From: "Judith Oppenheimer" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Hartman, Steve" [EMAIL PROTECTED],
"'Harald Tveit Alvestrand'" [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], "Wg-B@Dnso. Org" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [bwg+] RE: TM Sunrise +20 (Re: [wg-b] WG-B Report -Take II)
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2000 1:42 PM
To: Wg-B; Chicoine, Caroline; Paul M. Kane
Cc: Registrars List; 'Louis Touton'; 'Andrew McLaughlin'; 'names
council'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Michael Schneider'
Subject: [wg-b] RE: [registrars] Re: [council] suggested draft
resolution for today's NC call
To
Any dns server can operate as a root server. If a dns server runs the
"." zone - then it's s root server.
Example - if I wanted to operate a root server using the ORSC roots, as i
do on mine - I secondary the file from the ORSC primary root server.
Example:
I would change my named.conf file
On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Ron Bennett wrote:
Before people get all excited about alternative
roots, think about liability...
For example what happens if an alternative
root has incorrect information??
That's not possible
Ie. Let's say an alternative root has Buy.com
pointing to some
On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Bob Garth wrote:
Joe, thank you, that was great(!!!), and yes, it answers most of my
questions, but one. At what version of bind/named needs to be used that
supports .db (database files) other than the obvious, the most recent?
Just wondering if it's nessacary for me
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 18:11:27 -0400
From: James Love [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list RANDOM-BITS
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
ecommerce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Random-bits] Stefan Friedman: no 3-letter .com names left
As ICANN
There's a few problems with the namespace roots which I'll spell out here.
1. Non of the namespace root servers provide for zone transfers of the
root. Therefore it is impossible to determine what tld space is in them.
2. Lack of co-operation - when John Hunt enumerated the namespace he
James Love wrote:
We are more likely to be involved in proposals for other civil
society TLDs.
Those proposals will be treated by the INTA, WIPO, and the DNSO NC
with the same disdain as .union or anything else that they see as
complicating or intruding on their hegemony over the traditional
Three beggars are begging in New York City.
The first one wrote "beg" on his broken steel cup and he
received ten bucks after one day.
The second one wrote "beg.com" on his cup and after one
day he received hundreds of thousand dollars. Someone even
wanted to take him to NASDAQ.
The third
Roger Cochetti says:
A decision to start now with at least two new "proof of concept" TLDs,
by means that allow careful yet rapid deployment, will not in any way
limit ICANN's approach to future namespace expansion.
This is disingenuous and untrue. The first ones will obviously
become a
Roger Cochetti says:
In other words, put into immediate effect a measure which is
currently being hotly disputed and which runs directly counter to
the interests of a large percentage of Internet users.
In the spirit of gaining new experience and as a reflection of the rapid
global growth
As irony would have it given recent discussions here about .union and
.sucks, our local county newspaper, the Marin Independent Journal, ran a
feature article today, "Online whines with a bitter aftertaste."
Dan Parisi , founder of Whitehouse.com (a porn site) has spent
approximately $100,000 to
17 matches
Mail list logo
