(fixed)
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 07:35:11 +0100 (BST)
From: Jim Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IFWP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Lawrence Lessig [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Gordon Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Domain Policy [EMAIL PROTECTED],
AWPD [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
[Lessig:]
But second, and more to the point, I know first hand what lead to the end of
the IFWP process, as I was part of the negotiations in that process. Of all
the "parties" in that negotiation, Berkman was the last pushing for the
Although Jim and I had many differences of opinion both on the desired result and how
to get there I have to agree with his version of history. But Singapore was a long time
ago. I think what we are doing here is finger-pointing. What good is it to asssign
blame now? I dont see it changing
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Dan Steinberg wrote:
Although Jim and I had many differences of opinion both on the desired result and how
to get there I have to agree with his version of history. But Singapore was a long
time
ago. I think what we are doing here is finger-pointing. What good is it to
At 03:14 PM 9/18/00 +0100, Jim Dixon wrote:
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Dan Steinberg wrote:
Although Jim and I had many differences of opinion both on the desired result and
how
to get there I have to agree with his version of history. But Singapore was a long
time
ago. I think what we are doing
FWIW: the minutes of the final two meetings of the IFWP Steering Committee
(September 3 and 5, 1998) are still posted at
http://www.domainhandbook.com/scmin.html
One has to wonder why so few people (particularly Sims, Frankel, Roberts,
Magaziner) were able to wield so much power over what was
At 03:11 PM 9/16/00, Lawrence Lessig wrote:
First, as I would have thought obvious, there is something more than bizarre
about the idea that in the mix of actors in the initial formation of ICANN
-- representatives of the most powerful government in the world, the most
powerful corporations in
