On Sat, 4 Nov 2000, jim bell wrote:
Nevertheless, what has happened here demonstrates a basic flaw at the
heart of the domain name system. ICANN and many essential Internet
resources remain subject to US jurisdiction. ICANN itself is just a
California corporation, so it is subject to
As Worlds Collide
By Jay Fenello
An Aligning With Purpose(sm) Column
As I sit here and watch the days go by, I am constantly
amazed at the many ways that the Internet is changing our
world. Today, most of these changes are subtle, and not
so easy to recognize. Tomorrow, these
Last year alternate roots supported 0.3% of internet traffic.
This year alternate roots are supporting 5.5% of internet traffic.
The BIND study this year to date has ennumerated 60,513 dns (15% of
399,937 dns) of which 3,331 report they are using non-USG roots.
In my opinion - this is
On Sun, 5 Nov 2000, William X. Walsh wrote:
Hello Ron,
Sunday, November 05, 2000, 5:28:03 PM, you wrote:
At 06:34 PM 11/5/00 -0500, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
Last year alternate roots supported 0.3% of internet traffic.
This year alternate roots are supporting 5.5% of internet
On Sun, 5 Nov 2000, William X. Walsh wrote:
That is not what you said in the original post, this is:
Last year alternate roots supported 0.3% of internet traffic.
This year alternate roots are supporting 5.5% of internet traffic.
You have no basis for saying how much traffic the
On Sun, 5 Nov 2000, William X. Walsh wrote:
I understand. In fact the estimate is correct. Unfortuantely I don't
have the time to teach you statistical analysis. But we can be confident
that 5% of internet traffic is non USG. My results are representative and
can be extrapolated
