hough it's not
possible to make sure every single IP holder is aware. Our next meeting
is April 3-4 in Calgary, Canada. Information is available on the ARIN
website at www.arin.net.
Regards,
Kim Hubbard
ARIN
At 05:41 AM 3/13/00 -0500, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
>response below ..
>
one domain seems silly to me. According to
>the latest stats, ARIN, the largest IP registry does 4
>allocaitons ina peak load, 2 a day nominally. ARIN's servers
>are still housed at and run by NSI.
ARIN's servers are not housed at nor run by NSI.
Kim Hubbard
ARIN
>
>So
At 01:34 PM 5/25/99 -0700, Karl Auerbach wrote:
>
>Any somebody needs to award Tony Gomes a medal for keeping his temper
>(and doing a fine job) in what must be one of the most stressful contexts
>to be found on the net.
That's Chuck Gomes...or was that a freudian slip ;-)
>
>So, despite my tone
At 01:00 PM 5/25/99 -0700, you wrote:
>At 03:46 PM 5/25/99 -0400, Kim Hubbard wrote:
>>I love this...Dave Crocker actually telling someone to act professional.
>>:-) Too much!!
>
>Yup. It means that I know how to respond to the kind of crap you are
>generating, in kind.
Karl,
I was not commenting on whether NSI is or is not an entreprenureal company.
I was disagreeing with Crocker's statement that NSI did not have to build
an infrastructure...according to him everything was just handed to them one
day
and the next day they started raking in the dough.
Kim
I love this...Dave Crocker actually telling someone to act professional.
:-) Too much!!
Kim
At 12:29 PM 5/25/99 -0700, Dave Crocker wrote:
>At 02:53 PM 5/25/99 -0400, Kim Hubbard wrote:
>> >Everyone involved noted how when NSI took over, the quality of service
>> >s
At 11:08 AM 5/25/99 -0700, Karl Auerbach wrote:
[snip]
>
>Everyone involved noted how when NSI took over, the quality of service
>substantially declined.
Wow! you talked to everyone? Did you take an online poll or just called
everyone up?
>
>In other words, NSI didn't bring anything new to the
of that but I am sick
and tired of you making it sound like the whole experience was a walk in
the park and that NSI contributed nothing. NSI and its staff have paid
their dues and they deserve at least a modicum of respect and credit.
Kim Hubbard
>
>>When the various NSFNet cooperativ
