What would not constitute capture by these criteria for some group or
other? Capture is therefore a meaningless way of saying that 'they' have
it and 'we' haven't. But the essence of the purportedly democratic
structure here is that this kind of alternance between 'we' and 'they'
take place. There
To simplify matters, and to accommodate those who wish to have foreign language
input on the IFWP list, would it be fair to approximate this to 'quis custodes
ipsos custodiet?'. A question which has never been rigorously or logically
answered in any domain of human affairs? And, consequently, for
Message bounced from [EMAIL PROTECTED] list.
"Mark R. Measday" wrote:
> To what degree would this replicate or negate the power of governments in
> the Governmental Advisory Section?
>
> Legal complexities aside, might it not be slightly embarrassing if
> identified g
Mr Fenello brings up in his analysis excellent points in support of the
trademark community. However, and if I may speak, using Mr Fenello's hopefully
uncopyrighted trademark phrase, respectfully; if human relations were composed
of a series of protective property rights alone preventing innovati
For purposes of comparison, what other technologies have been deemed illegal recently?
Or is it just the use of the technology for specific purposes?
Diane Cabell wrote:
> Milton Mueller wrote:
>
> > Kent Crispin wrote:
> > ()
> > > are
> > > we changing the caching mechanism?
> >
> > Take a
One of the questions to which I didn't get an answer in Chile was what
constitutes a quorum of interest sufficient for ICANN to accept GAC's
advice. If
GAC is the voice of thirty or forty governments, it is presumably not
the voice
of the other 160 plus. Is ICANN supposed to consult the others
pri
Joe,
I think the majority of participants on this list would have no respect
for Mr Rutkowski were he not
known to be acting intelligently as devil's advocate.
Whether ICANN is or will be formally or informally required to follow
GAC advice, I assume is a matter
for private consultation between
The following email was sent to you misleadingly carrying the title used
by the previous correspondent. Apologies.
One of the questions to which I didn't get an answer in Chile was what
constitutes a quorum of interest sufficient for ICANN to accept GAC's
advice. If GAC is the voice of thirty or
Roberto,
It is unclear to me whether you are speaking in an advisory capacity for the
governments or in a private capacity interpreting the ICANN bylaws. BTW, how
are Vienna and the reactors?
MM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Mark,
>
> You wrote:
> >
> > One of the questions to which I didn't get
he private sector (i.e. you) to
pay directly
for an administration that otherwise would be buried in international
accounting
conventions somewhere.
Why should I know anything of IBM's interest? They're my ISP.
Cheers
MM
"J. Baptista" wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Aug 1999, Mar
hat any national government is free to
participate
in the GAC; if they choose not to, that is their choice, not ICANN's
or the
GAC's.
(Embedded
image moved Mark R Measday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
to file: 08/31/99 11:46 AM
pic07642.pcx)
Extension:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Is Bob Shaw writing the report, then?
"A.M. Rutkowski" wrote:
> If you want to get your free copy of the Final Acts of the
> ITU Plenipotentiary Conference, it's available temporarily
> at: http://www.itu.int/itudoc/gs/test/57570.html Click
> on download. After that, there will always be a fr
Tony,
Your comment reminds me of an allied, but separate matter.
In a recent ITU report on internet development, one of the
largely implicit assumptions was the supposition that the internet
pricing model is largely parasitic on historic telco investment and
spare capacity
-despite the technical
Is is possible to know what representations ICANN has made, or which
observers have been sent by ICANN to the WTO conference in Seattle next
month?
MM
begin:vcard
n:Measday;Mark
tel;cell:0044370947420
tel;fax:0033450209492
tel;work:0033450209492
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.josmarian.ch
Time to export some of your antitrust laws, then. But I think Joe Sims just
unsubscribed from this list
Best,
MM
Jay Fenello wrote:
> Excerpt from:
>
> http://www.thenation.com/issue/991206/1206borosage.shtml
>
> The global economy that the WTO is now intended to police has worked
> remark
>
> Esther Dyson
>
> At 04:40 pm 11/22/1999 +0100, Mark R Measday wrote:
> >Is is possible to know what representations ICANN has made, or which
> >observers have been sent by ICANN to the WTO conference in Seattle next
> >month?
> >
> >MM
> >Content-
What was the reaction to this suggestion?
James Love wrote:
> Funny you should say this. I was just at a Department of State briefing
> on information policy last week, and when discussing a the need for new
> global rules on consumer protection, Don Heath suggested ICANN as a
> model, where NG
Michael,
Not quite sure who are you are pointing your finger at. Gentlemen such as Mr Sweeney
and yourself are entitled to your views. However, it might be apposite to point out
that the transition of the GATT to WTO took place at least with the blessing of, one
might argue at the behest of, g
Joop, it's not fair to quote out of context. I appreciate your arguments, but
this was originally in response to a thread concerning the WTO and ICANN's
engagement with that organization. Esther Dyson was commenting on the mess the
WTO is, I think, not making statements concerning theoretical glob
re: WTO + SDMI = NWO (NEW WORLD ORDER)--AND THAT SPELLS TROUBLE
by Andy Oram
American Reporter Correspondent
CAMBRIDGE, MASS.--WTO, IMF, EU: has one of these changed
your life recently?
How about SDMI, PICS, or CALEA?
This list wasn't intended for b
Excellent article. Haven't read the book, so any summary is conceptual.. I wanted
to make the point that of the actors I have seen, the only institutional
involvement I have seen that has gone beyond the assertion of self-interest model
in trying to create ICANN is that of Berkman. For that they d
21 matches
Mail list logo
