FWIW: the minutes of the final two meetings of the IFWP Steering Committee
(September 3 and 5, 1998) are still posted at
http://www.domainhandbook.com/scmin.html
One has to wonder why so few people (particularly Sims, Frankel, Roberts,
Magaziner) were able to wield so much power over what was tou
At 03:14 PM 9/18/00 +0100, Jim Dixon wrote:
>On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Dan Steinberg wrote:
>
>> Although Jim and I had many differences of opinion both on the desired result and
>how
>> to get there I have to agree with his version of history. But Singapore was a long
>time
>> ago. I think what we a
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Dan Steinberg wrote:
> Although Jim and I had many differences of opinion both on the desired result and how
> to get there I have to agree with his version of history. But Singapore was a long
>time
> ago. I think what we are doing here is finger-pointing. What good is it t
Although Jim and I had many differences of opinion both on the desired result and how
to get there I have to agree with his version of history. But Singapore was a long time
ago. I think what we are doing here is finger-pointing. What good is it to asssign
blame now? I dont see it changing anythi
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
[Lessig:]
> >> > But second, and more to the point, I know first hand what lead to the end of
> >> > the IFWP process, as I was part of the negotiations in that process. Of all
> >> > the "parties" in that negotiation, Berkman was the last pushing for
At 07:35 AM 9/18/00 +0100, Jim Dixon wrote:
>On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Michael Sondow wrote:
>
>> > But second, and more to the point, I know first hand what lead to the end of
>> > the IFWP process, as I was part of the negotiations in that process. Of all
>> > the "parties" in that negotiation, Berkm
