[IFWP] Re: [Nc-tlds] new TLDs, charters -- ICANN control

2000-07-06 Thread James Love
"!Dr. Joe Baptista" wrote: > > On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, James Love wrote: > > > Internet, and management of all TLDs. However, not all registries > > should be required to provide first come first serve type services. For > > example, in a .union TLD, if such a TLD is managed by labor unions, they

[IFWP] Re: [Nc-tlds] new TLDs, charters -- ICANN control

2000-07-06 Thread !Dr. Joe Baptista
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, William X. Walsh wrote: > Name.space's excessive claims to TLDs have surely forfeited any rights > they might want to claim in any given TLD. Surely even those who > believe in this "prior" right issue of registries that knowingly > operated outside the real operation scope

[IFWP] Re: [Nc-tlds] new TLDs, charters -- ICANN control

2000-07-05 Thread !Dr. Joe Baptista
On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, James Love wrote: > Internet, and management of all TLDs. However, not all registries > should be required to provide first come first serve type services. For > example, in a .union TLD, if such a TLD is managed by labor unions, they > should be free to manage it, and rest