Diane Cabell a écrit:
> No, sir. I'm afraid you are still confusing subject headers with substantive
> recommendations and telephone conversations with official reports. We should
> add a disclaimer on the minutes to make that more clear.
What you don't seem to be cognizant of is that you are
Michael Sondow wrote:
> Diane Cabell a écrit:
>
> > All three of these statements are incorrect.
> > Again, I call attention to the reports submitted to ICANN in Singapore,
> > and caution against drawing incorrect conclusions from the abbreviated
> > notes of the teleconference call.
>
> Singapo
Dr Nii Quaynor a écrit:
> MAC deliberations at Singapore made recommendations on criteria. I recall
> that the criteria *did not* exclude people with criminal record because of
> potential problems of dissidents, for example. Hence its not true that no
> criteria were specified. This meeting was
Diane Cabell a écrit:
> All three of these statements are incorrect.
> Again, I call attention to the reports submitted to ICANN in Singapore,
> and caution against drawing incorrect conclusions from the abbreviated
> notes of the teleconference call.
Singapore was two months ago. The March 18th
Michael Sondow wrote:
> Okay. No exclusionary definition of the At large membership, that
> is, all the world can join. Two: no membership dues, that is, no
> legal contract between the members and the organization. Three: no
> voting mechanism defined in the bylaws, nothing that says how
> candi
As a follow-up to the reaction on the list today to the March 18th
M.A.C. recommendations, I should add that I discussed this situation
for two hours on the phone this afternoon with a very savvy lawyer
who heads the staff of a nation-wide activist organization. She
suggested I post an analysis of
