Re: [IFWP] RE: Forming a NCDNC

1999-03-16 Thread Roeland M.J. Meyer
At 09:53 AM 3/10/99 -0600, John B. Reynolds wrote: How do we define a NCDNC member? - People only? - Non-profit organizations? Both. - Educational organizations? - does ORSC qualify? - how about AIP? Yes, if they're non-profit. Why the prejudice against for-profits?

Re: [IFWP] RE: Forming a NCDNC

1999-03-13 Thread Michael Sondow
Martin B. Schwimmer a écrit: How will not-for-profit entities such as trade associations, marketing boards, research consortiums, which exist at the behest of commercial entities, be treated? The DNSO Formation Concepts of March 4 give constituency five as "Non-commercial domain name

[IFWP] RE: Forming a NCDNC

1999-03-10 Thread John B. Reynolds
Jay Fenello wrote: Questions: What qualifies as a domain name holder? - jay.per.to? - johnson.com? - bob.aol.com? - tom.co.au? All of the above. How do we define a NCDNC member? - People only? - Non-profit organizations? Both. - Educational organizations?

[IFWP] Re: Forming a NCDNC

1999-03-10 Thread Bret A. Fausett
Jay Fenello wrote: Since ICANN has decided that a person or organization can belong to more than one constituency, one of the first orders of business is to define these constituencies in concrete terms. In other words, where and how do we draw the lines. I think we should leave the

RE: [IFWP] RE: Forming a NCDNC

1999-03-10 Thread David Schutt
Very poorly :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin B. Schwimmer How will not-for-profit entities such as trade associations, marketing boards, research consortiums, which exist at the behest of commercial entities, be treated?

[IFWP] Re: Forming a NCDNC

1999-03-10 Thread jeff Williams
Jay and all, And the Constituency Divisiveness begins, eh? How special! >;) A warned by many this would be the problem, and it seems that is has begun. I wonder how long this contentious problem will persist, 3 maybe 4 years? Jay Fenello wrote: Hello Everyone, One of the results of the Singapore

Re: [IFWP] RE: Forming a NCDNC

1999-03-10 Thread Jay Fenello
At 3/10/99, 11:14 AM, Martin B. Schwimmer wrote: What qualifies as a domain name holder? - jay.per.to? - johnson.com? - bob.aol.com? - tom.co.au? Do you mean [EMAIL PROTECTED]? does aol allot third level domains? I'm not sure, but according to the following posting, AOL has

Re: [IFWP] RE: Forming a NCDNC

1999-03-10 Thread Kent Crispin
On Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 01:11:21PM -0500, Jay Fenello wrote: At 3/10/99, 11:14 AM, Martin B. Schwimmer wrote: What qualifies as a domain name holder? - jay.per.to? - johnson.com? - bob.aol.com? - tom.co.au? Do you mean [EMAIL PROTECTED]? does aol allot third level

RE: [IFWP] Re: Forming a NCDNC

1999-03-10 Thread David Schutt
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Karl Auerbach Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 1999 3:43 PM To: IFWP Cc: ORSC Subject: Re: [IFWP] Re: Forming a NCDNC I think we should leave the constituency open to any non-commercial individual or organization. The definition of &quo

Re: [IFWP] Re: Forming a NCDNC

1999-03-10 Thread jeff Williams
Karl and all, You are exactly correct that constituencies are a bad and nearly indefinable thing to a certainty and as well very divisive as we are now beginning to see and will see much more of in the coming months, maybe even years.. We and you warned that such a model for a DNSO was a

Re: [IFWP] Re: Forming a NCDNC

1999-03-10 Thread Karl Auerbach
I think we should leave the constituency open to any non-commercial individual or organization. The definition of "non-commercial," however, should not be "non-profit." The ICC and INTA are both "non-profit" entities, but their purpose is to vigorously promote commercial interests. This